Literature DB >> 11887877

Predicting the outcome of sciatica at short-term follow-up.

Patrick C A J Vroomen1, M C T F M de Krom, J A Knottnerus.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of the clinical findings elicited in the patient presenting with sciatica is unknown. AIM: To investigate whether history and physical examination findings can predict outcome. DESIGN OF STUDY: Prospective study of prognostic factors.
SETTING: A sample of primary care patients with sciatica.
METHOD: Short-term favourable outcome was registered as improvement perceived by the patient after two weeks. Long-term failure was defined as eventual surgery or lack of improvement after three months.
RESULTS: The signs and symptoms that most consistently predicted an unfavourable outcome were: a disease duration of more than 30 days; increased pain on sitting; and more pain on coughing, sneezing or straining. The straight leg raising test and, to a lesser degree the reversed straight leg raising test, were the most consistent examination findings associated with poor outcome. Chances of short-term improvement were also related to the body weight relative to the length.
CONCLUSION: The predictors in this study can indicate the prognosis of patients with sciatica at an early stage. Knowledge of these prognostic factors may help to fine tune treatment decisions and improve patient selection in trials of conservative therapy strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11887877      PMCID: PMC1314232     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  15 in total

1.  Clinical findings as outcome predictors in rehabilitation of patients with sciatica.

Authors:  F Nykvist; H Alaranta; M Hurme; S L Karppi
Journal:  Int J Rehabil Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  [A new symptom of intervertebral disk hernia].

Authors:  A KEMP
Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd       Date:  1950-06-24

3.  Comparative validity of the sickness impact profile and shorter scales for functional assessment in low-back pain.

Authors:  R A Deyo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  A study of the natural history of low-back pain. Part II: development of guidelines for trials of treatment in primary care.

Authors:  M Roland; R Morris
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain.

Authors:  M Roland; R Morris
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The natural history of lumbar intervertebral disc extrusions treated nonoperatively.

Authors:  J A Saal; J S Saal; R J Herzog
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Clinical factors predicting outcome after surgery for herniated lumbar disc: an epidemiological multivariate analysis.

Authors:  C Barrios; M Ahmed; J I Arrotegui; A Björnsson
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1990-09

8.  Preoperative psychological tests as predictors of success of chemonucleolysis in the treatment of the low-back syndrome.

Authors:  L L Wiltse; P D Rocchio
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  When does the patient with a disc herniation undergo lumbosacral discectomy?

Authors:  P C Vroomen; M C de Krom; J A Knottnerus
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  The differential utility of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. A predictor of outcome in lumbar laminectomy for disc herniation versus spinal stenosis.

Authors:  L D Herron; J Turner; S Clancy; P Weiner
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  43 in total

1.  Two-year real-world results of lumbar discectomy with bone-anchored annular closure in patients at high risk of reherniation.

Authors:  Ardeshir Ardeshiri; Larry E Miller; Claudius Thomé
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Nonsurgical Treatment Choices by Individuals with Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation in the United States: Associations with Long-term Outcomes.

Authors:  Anne Thackeray; Julie M Fritz; Jon D Lurie; Wenyan Zhao; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.159

3.  Duration of symptoms resulting from lumbar disc herniation: effect on treatment outcomes: analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT).

Authors:  Jeffrey A Rihn; Alan S Hilibrand; Kristen Radcliff; Mark Kurd; Jon Lurie; Emily Blood; Todd J Albert; James N Weinstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Spontaneously disappearing lumbar disc protrusion.

Authors:  Shungu Ushewokunze; Naeem Abbas; Ronan Dardis; Ian Killeen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 5.  Pharmacological management of low back pain.

Authors:  Roger Chou
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Laser-evoked potentials: prognostic relevance of pain pathway defects in patients with acute radiculopathy.

Authors:  Markus Quante; Jürgen Lorenz; Michael Hauck
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Implementation of a shared care guideline for back pain: effect on unnecessary referrals.

Authors:  Margot Fleuren; Elise Dusseldorp; Susan van den Bergh; Hans Vlek; Janny Wildschut; Elske van den Akker; Dirk Wijkel
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 2.038

8.  Prolonged conservative care versus early surgery in patients with sciatica caused by lumbar disc herniation: two year results of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Wilco C Peul; Wilbert B van den Hout; Ronald Brand; Ralph T W M Thomeer; Bart W Koes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-05-23

9.  Nonoperative treatment for lumbosacral radiculopathy: what factors predict treatment failure?

Authors:  Pradeep Suri; M Jake Carlson; James Rainville
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Timing of surgery for sciatica: subgroup analysis alongside a randomized trial.

Authors:  Wilco C Peul; Mark P Arts; Ronald Brand; Bart W Koes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.