Literature DB >> 11884798

Cranial reconstruction with computer-generated hard-tissue replacement patient-matched implants: indications, surgical technique, and long-term follow-up.

Barry L Eppley1, Matthew Kilgo, John J Coleman.   

Abstract

The aim of this clinical study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of using computer-generated alloplastic (hard-tissue replacement) implants for the reconstruction of large defects of the upper craniofacial region. Fourteen patients who had large (> 150 cm2) preexisting defects of the cranium or cranio-orbital region underwent surgical reconstruction. Preoperatively, a three-dimensional computed tomographic scan was obtained from which an anatomic model was fabricated. The defect in the model was then used to create an alloplastic (hard tissue-replacement polymer) implant for reconstruction and surgical placement. At the time of surgery, the implant was secured into position with either metal or resorbable fixation. In cases where the frontal sinus was in proximity to the implant, the frontal sinus was either cranialized and covered with a pericranial flap or obliterated with hydroxyapatite cement. In cases that had been previously irradiated or infected, wide bony debridement and coverage with a vascularized muscle was initially performed, followed by implant reconstruction 6 months later. All implants fit easily into the bone defects, and only four (29 percent) required some minor adjustments to complete the fit. All patients healed uneventfully. With a minimum of 1 year follow-up (average, 3 years) in all cases, excellent contours have been maintained and all patients have remained infection-free. In large cranial defects, custom implants fabricated from porous, hydrophilic hard-tissue replacement polymer provide an exacting anatomic fit and a solid stable reconstruction. This method of reconstruction in these defects is rapid and exact, and significantly reduces operative time. Critical attention must be paid, however, to management of the frontal sinus and preexisting bone infection and the quality of the overlying soft-tissue cover.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11884798     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200203000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  18 in total

1.  Review of bone substitutes.

Authors:  Landon S Pryor; Earl Gage; Claude-Jean Langevin; Fernando Herrera; Andrew D Breithaupt; Chad R Gordon; Ahmed M Afifi; James E Zins; Hal Meltzer; Amanda Gosman; Steve R Cohen; Ralph Holmes
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2009-10

2.  Fracture of a HTR-PMI cranioplastic implant after severe TBI.

Authors:  Antonio López González; Pedro Pérez Borredá; Rebeca Conde Sardón
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 3.  Calvarial Reconstruction.

Authors:  Arvind Badhey; Sameep Kadakia; Moustafa Mourad; Jared Inman; Yadranko Ducic
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.314

4.  Customized cranioplasty implants using three-dimensional printers and polymethyl-methacrylate casting.

Authors:  Bum-Joon Kim; Ki-Sun Hong; Kyung-Jae Park; Dong-Hyuk Park; Yong-Gu Chung; Shin-Hyuk Kang
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2012-12-31

5.  Customized biomimetic scaffolds created by indirect three-dimensional printing for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Ju-Yeon Lee; Bogyu Choi; Benjamin Wu; Min Lee
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 9.954

6.  Patient-Specific Implant for Residual Facial Asymmetry following Orthognathic Surgery in Unilateral Craniofacial Microsomia.

Authors:  Femke Staal; Britt Pluijmers; Eppo Wolvius; Maarten Koudstaal
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2016-03-28

7.  Prefabricated patient-matched cranial implants for reconstruction of large skull defects.

Authors:  Jarle Sundseth; Jon Berg-Johnsen
Journal:  J Cent Nerv Syst Dis       Date:  2013-02-20

8.  Novel composite implant in craniofacial bone reconstruction.

Authors:  Matti J Peltola; Pekka K Vallittu; Ville Vuorinen; Allan A J Aho; Antti Puntala; Kalle M J Aitasalo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Customized alloplastic cranioplasty of large bone defects by 3D-printed prefabricated mold template after posttraumatic decompressive craniectomy: A technical note.

Authors:  Bruno Splavski; Goran Lakicevic; Marko Kovacevic; Damir Godec
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2022-04-22

10.  Cranioplasty with autologous cryopreserved bone after decompressive craniectomy: complications and risk factors for developing surgical site infection.

Authors:  J Sundseth; A Sundseth; J Berg-Johnsen; W Sorteberg; K-F Lindegaard
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 2.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.