Literature DB >> 27516845

Patient-Specific Implant for Residual Facial Asymmetry following Orthognathic Surgery in Unilateral Craniofacial Microsomia.

Femke Staal1, Britt Pluijmers1, Eppo Wolvius1, Maarten Koudstaal1.   

Abstract

Craniofacial microsomia (CFM) is a congenital anomaly with a variable phenotype. The most prominent feature of CFM is a predominantly unilateral hypoplasia of the mandible, leading to facial asymmetry. Even after correction of the midline, there is often a remaining hard- and soft-tissue deficiency over the body of the mandible and cheek on the affected side. This clinical report describes the skeletal augmentation of the mandible with a patient-specific implant to treat residual facial asymmetry in two female patients with unilateral CFM. Good aesthetic results were achieved in both patients treated with either a Medpor or polyetheretherketone implant without complications after a follow-up time of 55 and 30 months, respectively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alloplastic implants; facial asymmetry; patient-specific implant; reconstruction; unilateral craniofacial microsomia

Year:  2016        PMID: 27516845      PMCID: PMC4980143          DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1581061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr        ISSN: 1943-3875


  18 in total

1.  Maxillofacial reconstruction using polyetheretherketone patient-specific implants by "mirroring" computational planning.

Authors:  Paolo Scolozzi
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 2.326

2.  Use of two-piece polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants in orbitozygomatic reconstruction.

Authors:  M L Goodson; D Farr; D Keith; R J Banks
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 1.651

3.  Restoration of facial symmetry in hemifacial microsomia with mandibular outer cortex bone grafting combined with distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Lai Gui; Zhiyong Zhang; Mengqing Zang; Wei Liu; Feng Niu; Bing Yu; Xiaojun Tang; Jianfeng Liu; Meng Wang; Wuyuan Tan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Team management and treatment outcomes for patients with hemifacial microsomia.

Authors:  Junji Ohtani; William Y Hoffman; Karin Vargervik; Snehlata Oberoi
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Free groin flap in hemifacial volume reconstruction.

Authors:  Alistair R M Cobb; Maarten J Koudstaal; Neil W Bulstrode; Timothy W Lloyd; David J Dunaway
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 1.651

6.  Outcomes following rhinoplasty using autologous costal cartilage.

Authors:  Byoung Jae Moon; Ho Jun Lee; Yong Ju Jang
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2012 May-Jun

7.  Facial skeletal reconstruction using porous polyethylene implants.

Authors:  Michael J Yaremchuk
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 8.  Current concepts in the understanding and management of hemifacial microsomia.

Authors:  R R Cousley; M L Calvert
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  1997-10

9.  Volume changes of autogenous bone grafts after alveolar ridge augmentation of atrophic maxillae and mandibles.

Authors:  L Sbordone; P Toti; G B Menchini-Fabris; C Sbordone; P Piombino; F Guidetti
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 2.789

10.  Use of customized polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants in the reconstruction of complex maxillofacial defects.

Authors:  Michael M Kim; Kofi D O Boahene; Patrick J Byrne
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb
View more
  1 in total

1.  Mandibular Fracture in a Hemifacial Microsomia Patient following Implant Failure and Hardware Infection: A Case Report.

Authors:  Kausar Ali; Rami P Dibbs; Renata S Maricevich
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2022-09-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.