Literature DB >> 11867774

Trends in the utilization of MR angiography and body MR imaging in the US Medicare population: 1993-1998.

Barry J Livstone1, Laurence Parker, David C Levin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the trends in utilization of non-neurologic (ie, body) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and of MR angiographic examinations performed from 1993 to 1998, the trends in non-radiologist participation in MR imaging, and the relative reimbursements for these examinations compared with those for all other noninvasive imaging studies performed in 1998.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: By using the 1993, 1996, and 1998 nationwide Medicare Part B databases, utilization rates per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries and physician reimbursements were determined for seven MR angiography and 14 body MR imaging CPT-4 (Current Procedural Terminology, version 4) codes. Medicare specialty codes were used to categorize physicians as radiologists or non-radiologists.
RESULTS: The utilization rate per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries for all 21 MR angiography and body MR imaging codes increased from 649 in 1993 to 1,253 in 1996 and to 1,876 in 1998--a 189% increase. These rates represented 0.55% of the total noninvasive imaging volume in 1998 and 2.8% of physician reimbursements. Musculoskeletal MR imaging utilization increased 142% from 1993 to 1998 compared with a 58% increase in the utilization of other body MR imaging studies. Non-radiologist participation in musculoskeletal MR imaging increased from 2.9% in 1993 to 3.6% in 1996 and to 5.6% in 1998.
CONCLUSION: MR angiography and body MR imaging utilization rates increased substantially from 1993 to 1998. However, these studies still account for a minor fraction of all noninvasive imaging examinations performed and fees reimbursed. MR angiography and musculoskeletal MR imaging utilization has increased rapidly. Non-radiologist participation in musculoskeletal MR imaging is increasing.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11867774     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2223010460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  5 in total

1.  [Hospital radiology--what is the way forward in view of the structural changes in health care].

Authors:  I P Arlart
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: optimizing 3 Tesla imaging.

Authors:  Lauren Shapiro; Ernesto Staroswiecki; Garry Gold
Journal:  Semin Roentgenol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 0.800

Review 3.  Muskuloskeletal MR imaging at 3.0 T: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Nicolae Bolog; Daniel Nanz; Dominik Weishaupt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  The prevalence of positive imaging findings on MRI scans ordered by chiropractic versus medical providers.

Authors:  Larry Morries; Terry Yochum; Michael Barry; John Slizeski; Donald Freuden; Clark Danielson
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2006

5.  Intestinal obstruction: trends in imaging utilization and their influence in its rising hospital bill.

Authors:  Hansel J Otero; Sukru M Erturk; Roberto E Ochoa; Silvia Ondategui-Parra; Frank J Rybicki; Pablo R Ros
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2008-04-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.