PURPOSE: To determine the number and cytoarchitecture of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in the female Wistar rat, by using a newly devised procedure for rapid RGC counting in the entire retina that avoids assumptions about RGC spatial arrangement. METHODS: RGCs of normal female Wistar rats were retrogradely labeled with a fluorescent tracer. Automated counting was accomplished by applying standard imaging software to analysis of all labeled cells in retinal flatmounts. The method was validated by comparison of automated and manual counts of 70,000 RGCs in frames covering the density range in the normal rat retina of 600 to 3600 RGC/mm(2). RGC numbers were determined for each retina and compared with the contralateral retina of the same animal. RGC density maps were constructed for each retina. RGC size distribution was determined. RESULTS: Automated RGC counting showed a good linear correlation with manual counting (R(2) = 0.9416). Mean total RGC count in 10 rat eyes was 97,609 +/- 3,930 (SEM) per eye. Contralateral eyes differed by an average of 4.1% (3983 plus minus 5098 RGCs). Size analysis calculated from cell areas confirmed that the majority of rat RGCs are between 7 and 21.5 microm in equivalent diameter. The RGC counts for all frames at the same eccentricity in all 10 of the retinas showed that variability increased with eccentricity and increased further as the fractional area of the retina sampled at each eccentricity was reduced. There was also significant variability in the spatial density of the RGCs at the same eccentricity location between different eyes. Comparison of total RGC counts between left and right eyes estimated from RGC counts in sectors of the retina (hemiretinas or quadrants) showed increased variability compared with counting all the RGCs in a retina. CONCLUSIONS: RGCs in the Wistar rat display significant variability in their cytoarchitecture. Such variability can make quantification by sampling problematic for diffuse, and particularly, for focal RGC losses resulting from experimental interventions, unless virtually the entire RGC population is counted.
PURPOSE: To determine the number and cytoarchitecture of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in the female Wistar rat, by using a newly devised procedure for rapid RGC counting in the entire retina that avoids assumptions about RGC spatial arrangement. METHODS: RGCs of normal female Wistar rats were retrogradely labeled with a fluorescent tracer. Automated counting was accomplished by applying standard imaging software to analysis of all labeled cells in retinal flatmounts. The method was validated by comparison of automated and manual counts of 70,000 RGCs in frames covering the density range in the normal rat retina of 600 to 3600 RGC/mm(2). RGC numbers were determined for each retina and compared with the contralateral retina of the same animal. RGC density maps were constructed for each retina. RGC size distribution was determined. RESULTS: Automated RGC counting showed a good linear correlation with manual counting (R(2) = 0.9416). Mean total RGC count in 10 rat eyes was 97,609 +/- 3,930 (SEM) per eye. Contralateral eyes differed by an average of 4.1% (3983 plus minus 5098 RGCs). Size analysis calculated from cell areas confirmed that the majority of rat RGCs are between 7 and 21.5 microm in equivalent diameter. The RGC counts for all frames at the same eccentricity in all 10 of the retinas showed that variability increased with eccentricity and increased further as the fractional area of the retina sampled at each eccentricity was reduced. There was also significant variability in the spatial density of the RGCs at the same eccentricity location between different eyes. Comparison of total RGC counts between left and right eyes estimated from RGC counts in sectors of the retina (hemiretinas or quadrants) showed increased variability compared with counting all the RGCs in a retina. CONCLUSIONS: RGCs in the Wistar rat display significant variability in their cytoarchitecture. Such variability can make quantification by sampling problematic for diffuse, and particularly, for focal RGC losses resulting from experimental interventions, unless virtually the entire RGC population is counted.
Authors: Mark K Webster; Cynthia A Cooley-Themm; Joseph D Barnett; Harrison B Bach; Jessica M Vainner; Sarah E Webster; Cindy L Linn Journal: Neuroscience Date: 2017-01-29 Impact factor: 3.590
Authors: Kazuhiro Iwamoto; Patrick Birkholz; Austin Schipper; David Mata; David M Linn; Cindy L Linn Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-02-24 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: John Danias; Fran Shen; Manolis Kavalarakis; Bin Chen; David Goldblum; Kevin Lee; Maria-Florencia Zamora; YanLing Su; Scott E Brodie; Steven M Podos; Thom Mittag Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2005-08-16 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Michael G Anderson; Richard T Libby; Douglas B Gould; Richard S Smith; Simon W M John Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-03-09 Impact factor: 11.205