Literature DB >> 11863207

Respiratory rate measurement in adults--how reliable is it?

W S Lim1, S M Carty, J T Macfarlane, R E Anthony, J Christian, K S Dakin, P M Dennis.   

Abstract

Measurement of respiratory rate (RR) is essential in the evaluation of respiratory disorders. However, the variability in RR measurement in adults has never been adequately assessed. Respiratory rate was measured twice in 245 patients; the two measurements were performed by the same observer in 137 patients, by different observers in 58 patients and simultaneously by different observers in 50 patients. The mean (SD) difference between the first and second measurements was 0.03 (3); 95% limits of agreement-4.86-4.94 breaths min(-1), -5.7-5.7 breaths min(-1), and -4.2 to 4.4 breaths min(-1) for the same observer, different observer and simultaneous observer groups, respectively. The difference in RR measurements did not vary with RR. In conclusions on average, there is very good agreement between observers in RR measurement. Inter-observer variability may account for a difference of up to 6 breaths min(-1). This is relevant when applying clinical prediction rules based on threshold RR values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11863207     DOI: 10.1053/rmed.2001.1203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Med        ISSN: 0954-6111            Impact factor:   3.415


  10 in total

1.  Development of clinical sign based algorithms for community based assessment of omphalitis.

Authors:  L C Mullany; G L Darmstadt; J Katz; S K Khatry; S C LeClerq; R K Adhikari; J M Tielsch
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  The prognostic significance of respiratory rate in patients with pneumonia: a retrospective analysis of data from 705,928 hospitalized patients in Germany from 2010-2012.

Authors:  Richard Strauß; Santiago Ewig; Klaus Richter; Thomas König; Günther Heller; Torsten T Bauer
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Non-contact respiratory rate measurement validation for hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Amy D Droitcour; Todd B Seto; Byung-Kwon Park; Shuhei Yamada; Alex Vergara; Charles El Hourani; Tommy Shing; Andrea Yuen; Victor M Lubecke; Olga Boric-Lubecke
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009

4.  Inter-Observer Agreement in Measuring Respiratory Rate.

Authors:  Louise Gramstrup Nielsen; Lars Folkestad; Jacob Broder Brodersen; Mikkel Brabrand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Performance of Contactless Respiratory Rate Monitoring by Albus HomeTM, an Automated System for Nocturnal Monitoring at Home: A Validation Study.

Authors:  William Do; Richard Russell; Christopher Wheeler; Megan Lockwood; Maarten De Vos; Ian Pavord; Mona Bafadhel
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Evaluation of respiratory rate monitoring using a microwave Doppler sensor mounted on the ceiling of an intensive care unit: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Tanaka; Masashi Yokose; Shunsuke Takaki; Takahiro Mihara; Yusuke Saigusa; Takahisa Goto
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Poor inter-observer agreement in the measurement of respiratory rate in children: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  William James Daw; Ruth N Kingshott; Heather E Elphick
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2017-11-16

8.  Current clinical methods of measurement of respiratory rate give imprecise values.

Authors:  Gordon B Drummond; Darius Fischer; D K Arvind
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2020-09-28

9.  Classifying signals from a wearable accelerometer device to measure respiratory rate.

Authors:  Gordon B Drummond; Darius Fischer; Margaret Lees; Andrew Bates; Janek Mann; D K Arvind
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2021-04-26

10.  Quantitative systematic review: Sources of inaccuracy in manually measured adult respiratory rate data.

Authors:  Noa Kallioinen; Andrew Hill; Melany J Christofidis; Mark S Horswill; Marcus O Watson
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 3.057

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.