Literature DB >> 11863035

Making trade-offs: a probabilistic and context-sensitive model of choice behavior.

Claudia González-Vallejo1.   

Abstract

The stochastic difference model assumes that decision makers trade normalized attribute value differences when making choices. The model is stochastic, with choice probabilities depending on the normalized difference variable, d, and a decision threshold, delta. The decision threshold indexes a person's sensitivity to attribute value differences and is a free estimated parameter of the model. Depending on the choice context, a person may be more or less sensitive to attribute value differences, and hence delta may be used to measure context effects. With proportional difference used as the normalization, the proportional difference model (PD) was tested with 9 data sets, including published data (e.g., J. L. Myers, M. M. Suydam, & B. Gambino, 1965; A. Tversky, 1969). The model accounted for individual and group data well and described violations of stochastic dominance, independence, and weak and strong stochastic transitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11863035     DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.109.1.137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  10 in total

1.  Beyond common features: the role of roles in determining similarity.

Authors:  Matt Jones; Bradley C Love
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Doomed to repeat the successes of the past: history is best forgotten for repeated choices with nonstationary payoffs.

Authors:  Tim Rakow; Katherine Miler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-10

3.  Automatic biases in intertemporal choice.

Authors:  Wenjia Joyce Zhao; Adele Diederich; Jennifer S Trueblood; Sudeep Bhatia
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-04

4.  A probabilistic, dynamic, and attribute-wise model of intertemporal choice.

Authors:  Junyi Dai; Jerome R Busemeyer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2014-03-17

5.  Choice theories: What are they good for?

Authors:  Eric J Johnson
Journal:  J Consum Psychol       Date:  2013-01-01

6.  Thurstonian-Based Analyses: Past, Present, and Future Utilities.

Authors:  Ulf Böckenholt
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  Building Bridges between Perceptual and Economic Decision-Making: Neural and Computational Mechanisms.

Authors:  Christopher Summerfield; Konstantinos Tsetsos
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Decision making from economic and signal detection perspectives: development of an integrated framework.

Authors:  Spencer K Lynn; Jolie B Wormwood; Lisa F Barrett; Karen S Quigley
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-08

9.  Local Choices: Rationality and the Contextuality of Decision-Making.

Authors:  Ivo Vlaev
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2018-01-02

10.  Diminishing sensitivity and absolute difference in value-driven attention.

Authors:  Sunghyun Kim; Jason L Harman; Melissa R Beck
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.