Literature DB >> 24635188

A probabilistic, dynamic, and attribute-wise model of intertemporal choice.

Junyi Dai1, Jerome R Busemeyer1.   

Abstract

Most theoretical and empirical research on intertemporal choice assumes a deterministic and static perspective, leading to the widely adopted delay discounting models. As a form of preferential choice, however, intertemporal choice may be generated by a stochastic process that requires some deliberation time to reach a decision. We conducted 3 experiments to investigate how choice and decision time varied as a function of manipulations designed to examine the delay duration effect, the common difference effect, and the magnitude effect in intertemporal choice. The results, especially those associated with the delay duration effect, challenged the traditional deterministic and static view and called for alternative approaches. Consequently, various static or dynamic stochastic choice models were explored and fit to the choice data, including alternative-wise models derived from the traditional exponential or hyperbolic discount function and attribute-wise models built upon comparisons of direct or relative differences in money and delay. Furthermore, for the first time, dynamic diffusion models, such as those based on decision field theory, were also fit to the choice and response time data simultaneously. The results revealed that the attribute-wise diffusion model with direct differences, power transformations of objective value and time, and varied diffusion parameter performed the best and could account for all 3 intertemporal effects. In addition, the empirical relationship between choice proportions and response times was consistent with the prediction of diffusion models and thus favored a stochastic choice process for intertemporal choice that requires some deliberation time to make a decision. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24635188      PMCID: PMC4115005          DOI: 10.1037/a0035976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  21 in total

Review 1.  Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control.

Authors:  G Ainslie
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  The priority heuristic: making choices without trade-offs.

Authors:  Eduard Brandstätter; Gerd Gigerenzer; Ralph Hertwig
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  MDFT account of decision making under time pressure.

Authors:  Adele Diederich
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

4.  Loss aversion and inhibition in dynamical models of multialternative choice.

Authors:  Marius Usher; James L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice.

Authors:  Ian Krajbich; Carrie Armel; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  A dynamic, stochastic, computational model of preference reversal phenomena.

Authors:  Joseph G Johnson; Jerome R Busemeyer
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Notes on discounting.

Authors:  Howard Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  The simplest complete model of choice response time: linear ballistic accumulation.

Authors:  Scott D Brown; Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Discount functions and the measurement of patients' values. Women's decisions during childbirth.

Authors:  J J Christensen-Szalanski
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.583

View more
  21 in total

1.  The neural basis of value accumulation in intertemporal choice.

Authors:  Christian A Rodriguez; Brandon M Turner; Trisha Van Zandt; Samuel M McClure
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Automatic biases in intertemporal choice.

Authors:  Wenjia Joyce Zhao; Adele Diederich; Jennifer S Trueblood; Sudeep Bhatia
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-04

3.  The effects of a working memory load on drinking-related decisions: The role of incentives, disincentives, and lifetime alcohol problems.

Authors:  Polly F Ingram; Peter R Finn
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  A computational model of the Cambridge gambling task with applications to substance use disorders.

Authors:  Ricardo J Romeu; Nathaniel Haines; Woo-Young Ahn; Jerome R Busemeyer; Jasmin Vassileva
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-11-03       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  Intertemporal Decision-Making Involves Prefrontal Control Mechanisms Associated with Working Memory.

Authors:  Koji Jimura; Maria S Chushak; Andrew Westbrook; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Cumulative weighing of time in intertemporal tradeoffs.

Authors:  Marc Scholten; Daniel Read; Adam Sanborn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-09

Review 7.  Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues and History.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith; Scott D Brown; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  A random utility model of delay discounting and its application to people with externalizing psychopathology.

Authors:  Junyi Dai; Rachel L Gunn; Kyle R Gerst; Jerome R Busemeyer; Peter R Finn
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2015-11-23

9.  Amount and time exert independent influences on intertemporal choice.

Authors:  Dianna R Amasino; Nicolette J Sullivan; Rachel E Kranton; Scott A Huettel
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2019-02-25

10.  Testing the factor structure underlying behavior using joint cognitive models: Impulsivity in delay discounting and Cambridge gambling tasks.

Authors:  Peter D Kvam; Ricardo J Romeu; Brandon M Turner; Jasmin Vassileva; Jerome R Busemeyer
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2020-03-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.