Literature DB >> 11852169

Streamlining IRB review in multisite trials through single-study IRB Cooperative Agreements: experience of the Beta-Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial (CARET).

Mark D Thornquist1, Cim Edelstein, Gary E Goodman, Gilbert S Omenn.   

Abstract

With their extensive data and specimen repositories, clinical trials are a long-term, valuable resource to health researchers. However, assuring protection of participants' rights can be challenging, particularly when such trials are conducted at multiple sites with multiple Institutional Review Boards (IRBs). One little-used mechanism that can streamline IRB review in multisite trials while maintaining participants' protections is the single-study IRB Cooperative Agreement. This agreement is entirely different from reciprocity agreements between institutions. Beginning in 1996, the Beta-Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial established single-study IRB Cooperative Agreements among its performance sites, which reduced the average time to complete IRB approval from over 6 months to 1 month for each of many substudies. We describe our experience and make recommendations for other multisite clinical trials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11852169     DOI: 10.1016/s0197-2456(01)00187-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  6 in total

1.  "You Really Do Have to Know the Local Context": IRB Administrators and Researchers on the Implications of the NIH Single IRB Mandate for Multisite Genomic Studies.

Authors:  Nora B Henrikson; Paula R Blasi; Jeremy J Corsmo; Emily Sheffer Serdoz; Aaron Scrol; Sarah M Greene; Tanya L Matthews; James D Ralston
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 2.  Human subjects issues and IRB review in practice-based research.

Authors:  Leslie E Wolf; Janice Ferrara Walden; Bernard Lo
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Variation among institutional review boards in evaluating the design of a multicenter randomized trial.

Authors:  A R Stark; J E Tyson; P L Hibberd
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 4.  Antioxidant supplements for prevention of mortality in healthy participants and patients with various diseases.

Authors:  Goran Bjelakovic; Dimitrinka Nikolova; Lise Lotte Gluud; Rosa G Simonetti; Christian Gluud
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-03-14

5.  Recruitment activities for a nationwide, population-based, group-randomized trial: the VA MI-Plus study.

Authors:  Ellen Funkhouser; Deborah A Levine; Joe K Gerald; Thomas K Houston; Nancy K Johnson; Jeroan J Allison; Catarina I Kiefe
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 6.  What Do Ethical Guidelines for Epidemiology Say About an Ethics Review? A Qualitative Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jan Piasecki; Marcin Waligora; Vilius Dranseika
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.525

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.