Literature DB >> 31113270

"You Really Do Have to Know the Local Context": IRB Administrators and Researchers on the Implications of the NIH Single IRB Mandate for Multisite Genomic Studies.

Nora B Henrikson1, Paula R Blasi1, Jeremy J Corsmo2,3, Emily Sheffer Serdoz4, Aaron Scrol1, Sarah M Greene5, Tanya L Matthews1, James D Ralston1.   

Abstract

In 2016, the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced a new policy requiring single institutional review board (sIRB) review for multisite studies. However, adherence to the new policy requires the separation of regulatory institutional review board (IRB) work per Federal guidance from site-specific local compliance concerns. In particular, genomic research is subject to a wide range of state laws, institutional requirements, and local population preferences. In this qualitative study, we explored the anticipated needs of genomics researchers and IRB administrators around implementing the policy. We observed multiple uncertainties, particularly about intersite communication processes, sIRB selection processes, and roles of the reviewing IRB and local sites regarding local context information relevant to genomics. Optimal implementation of the NIH policy may require additional guidance for researchers and IRB administrators.

Entities:  

Keywords:  genomics; local context; multisite; research; single IRB

Year:  2019        PMID: 31113270      PMCID: PMC6565467          DOI: 10.1177/1556264619850440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  11 in total

1.  The process is the product: a new model for multisite IRB review of data-only studies.

Authors:  Sarah M Greene; Jeffrey Braff; Andrew Nelson; Robert J Reid
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2010 May-Jun

2.  Single-Minded Research Review: The Common Rule and Single IRB Policy.

Authors:  Carrie D Wolinetz; Francis S Collins
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 11.229

3.  The sIRB System: A Single Beacon of Progress in the Revised Common Rule?

Authors:  Vasiliki Rahimzadeh; Edward S Dove; Bartha Maria Knoppers
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 11.229

4.  Central institutional review board review for an academic trial network.

Authors:  Petra Kaufmann; P Pearl O'Rourke
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  A new sociotechnical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems.

Authors:  Dean F Sittig; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2010-10

6.  Costs and benefits of the national cancer institute central institutional review board.

Authors:  Todd H Wagner; Christine Murray; Jacquelyn Goldberg; Jeanne M Adler; Jeffrey Abrams
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-10-19       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Meeting the Challenge: The National Cancer Institute's Central Institutional Review Board for Multi-Site Research.

Authors:  Holly A Massett; Sharon L Hampp; Jacquelyn L Goldberg; Margaret Mooney; Linda K Parreco; Lori Minasian; Mike Montello; Grace E Mishkin; Catasha Davis; Jeffrey S Abrams
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Single IRBs in Multisite Trials: Questions Posed by the New NIH Policy.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman; Ekaterina Pivovarova; Charles W Lidz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.

Authors:  Sarah S Kalia; Kathy Adelman; Sherri J Bale; Wendy K Chung; Christine Eng; James P Evans; Gail E Herman; Sophia B Hufnagel; Teri E Klein; Bruce R Korf; Kent D McKelvey; Kelly E Ormond; C Sue Richards; Christopher N Vlangos; Michael Watson; Christa L Martin; David T Miller
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  The Utility of Template Analysis in Qualitative Psychology Research.

Authors:  Joanna Brooks; Serena McCluskey; Emma Turley; Nigel King
Journal:  Qual Res Psychol       Date:  2014-09-02
View more
  4 in total

1.  Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Hector F Myers; Alecia M Fair; Fernando Villalta; Katherina Walz; Bettina M Beech; William K Scott; David W Haas
Journal:  Health Equity       Date:  2021-05-13

2.  The IRB Reliance Exchange (IREx): A national web-based platform for operationalizing single IRB review.

Authors:  Emily Sheffer Serdoz; Terri Edwards; Jill Pulley; Jenni Beadles; Julie Ozier; Paul Harris; Gordon R Bernard; Todd W Rice
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2022-03-23

Review 3.  Capacity Development of Research Ethics Administrators: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Mutshidzi A Mulondo; Joyce M Tsoka-Gwegweni; Puleng LenkaBula; Perpetual Chikobvu
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 1.978

4.  Using single IRB consultations to meet the educational needs of investigative teams.

Authors:  Ann R Johnson; Mary Pautler; Jeri S Burr; Nael Abdelsamad; John M VanBuren; Lisa M Rigtrup; J Michael Dean; Erin Rothwell
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2022-08-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.