| Literature DB >> 31113270 |
Nora B Henrikson1, Paula R Blasi1, Jeremy J Corsmo2,3, Emily Sheffer Serdoz4, Aaron Scrol1, Sarah M Greene5, Tanya L Matthews1, James D Ralston1.
Abstract
In 2016, the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced a new policy requiring single institutional review board (sIRB) review for multisite studies. However, adherence to the new policy requires the separation of regulatory institutional review board (IRB) work per Federal guidance from site-specific local compliance concerns. In particular, genomic research is subject to a wide range of state laws, institutional requirements, and local population preferences. In this qualitative study, we explored the anticipated needs of genomics researchers and IRB administrators around implementing the policy. We observed multiple uncertainties, particularly about intersite communication processes, sIRB selection processes, and roles of the reviewing IRB and local sites regarding local context information relevant to genomics. Optimal implementation of the NIH policy may require additional guidance for researchers and IRB administrators.Entities:
Keywords: genomics; local context; multisite; research; single IRB
Year: 2019 PMID: 31113270 PMCID: PMC6565467 DOI: 10.1177/1556264619850440
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics ISSN: 1556-2646 Impact factor: 1.742