Literature DB >> 1578365

Human cytochrome P450 metabolism of teniposide and etoposide.

M V Relling1, R Evans, C Dass, D M Desiderio, J Nemec.   

Abstract

Although teniposide (VM26) and etoposide (VP16) are eliminated mostly by nonrenal mechanisms, their cytochrome P450 metabolism in humans has not been reported. Our objective was to determine the affinity and capacity of P450 O-demethylation of VM26 and VP16 in a variety of human livers. Formation of catechols of VM26 and VP16 was detected in 24 and 26 of 26 liver microsomal preparations, respectively, with wide variability in maximum catechol formation rates from VM26 (41-fold) and VP16 (39-fold range), even among normal livers. Maximal activity measurements at 500 microM substrate were lower for VM26 catechol formation (mean = 1.5 nmol/mg/hr) than for VP16 catechol (mean = 3.2 nmol/mg/hr) in 26 livers (P less than .001). Maximal activities for VP16 and VM26 O-demethylation, and ethoxycoumarin O-deethylation were significantly higher in normal than in diseased livers. No differences were found in activities related to age, sex or race of the liver donor. In all five livers tested over a range of substrate concentrations, Km (19.7, 23.2, 43.5, 30.1 and 22.0 microM) and Vmax values (1.0, 1.2, 4.4, 8.2 and 4.0 nmol/mg/hr) for VM26 were lower compared to values for VP16 (Km = 60.2, 115.1, 87.3, 42.1 and 81.9 microM; Vmax = 1.4, 3.3, 10.3, 27.5 and 10.1 nmol/mg/hr). Despite higher VP16 catechol formation, VM26 underwent greater overall reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate-dependent metabolism than VP16, consistent with greater nonrenal clearance of VM26 in vivo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1578365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  14 in total

1.  Randomized cross-over clinical trial to study potential pharmacokinetic interactions between cisplatin or carboplatin and etoposide.

Authors:  Huw D Thomas; David J Porter; Imke Bartelink; Joy R Nobbs; Michael Cole; Suzie Elliott; David R Newell; A Hilary Calvert; Martin Highley; Alan V Boddy
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Interactions between antiretrovirals and antineoplastic drug therapy.

Authors:  Tony Antoniou; Alice L Tseng
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Acute lymphoblastic leukemia: optimizing treatment strategies in children.

Authors:  Ajay Vora
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.022

4.  The kinetics of the auto-induction of ifosfamide metabolism during continuous infusion.

Authors:  A V Boddy; M Cole; A D Pearson; J R Idle
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 5.  The role of human cytochrome P450 enzymes in the metabolism of anticancer agents: implications for drug interactions.

Authors:  K T Kivistö; H K Kroemer; M Eichelbaum
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of treatment with oral etoposide.

Authors:  Giuseppe Toffoli; Giuseppe Corona; Barbara Basso; Mauro Boiocchi
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Antiprogestin pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and metabolism: implications for their long-term use.

Authors:  G R Jang; L Z Benet
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1997-12

8.  Association of CYP3A4 genotype with treatment-related leukemia.

Authors:  C A Felix; A H Walker; B J Lange; T M Williams; N J Winick; N K Cheung; B D Lovett; P C Nowell; I A Blair; T R Rebbeck
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-10-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Topoisomerase II and leukemia.

Authors:  Maryjean Pendleton; R Hunter Lindsey; Carolyn A Felix; David Grimwade; Neil Osheroff
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 10.  Use of etoposide in patients with organ dysfunction: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations.

Authors:  C F Stewart
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.