Literature DB >> 11846595

Animal flight dynamics II. Longitudinal stability in flapping flight.

G K Taylor1, A L R Thomas.   

Abstract

Stability is essential to flying and is usually assumed to be especially problematic in flapping flight. If so, problems of stability may have presented a particular hurdle to the evolution of flapping flight. In spite of this, the stability of flapping flight has never been properly analysed. Here we use quasi-static and blade element approaches to analyse the stability provided by a flapping wing. By using reduced order approximations to the natural modes of motion, we show that wing beat frequencies are generally high enough compared to the natural frequencies of motion for a quasi-static approach to be valid as a first approximation. Contrary to expectations, we find that there is noting inherently destabilizing about flapping: beating the wings faster simply amplifies any existing stability or instability, and flapping can even enhance stability compared to gliding at the same air speed. This suggests that aerodynamic stability may not have been a particular hurdle in the evolution of flapping flight. Hovering animals, like hovering helicopters, are predicted to possess neutral static stability. Flapping animals, like fixed wing aircraft, are predicted to be stable in forward flight if the mean flight force acts above and/or behind the centre of gravity. In this case, the downstroke will always be stabilizing. The stabilizing contribution may be diminished by an active upstroke with a low advance ratio and more horizontal stroke plane; other forms of the upstroke may make a small positive contribution to stability. An active upstroke could, therefore, be used to lower stability and enhance manoeuvrability. Translatory mechanisms of unsteady lift production are predicted to amplify the stability predicted by a quasi-static analysis. Non-translatory mechanisms will make little or no contribution to stability. This may be one reason why flies, and other animals which rely upon non-translatory aerodynamic mechanisms, often appear inherently unstable. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11846595     DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.2001.2470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  13 in total

1.  Predicting power-optimal kinematics of avian wings.

Authors:  Ben Parslew
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  Inspiration for wing design: how forelimb specialization enables active flight in modern vertebrates.

Authors:  Diana D Chin; Laura Y Matloff; Amanda Kay Stowers; Emily R Tucci; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Elaborate horns in a giant rhinoceros beetle incur negligible aerodynamic costs.

Authors:  Erin L McCullough; Bret W Tobalske
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Aerodynamics, sensing and control of insect-scale flapping-wing flight.

Authors:  Wei Shyy; Chang-Kwon Kang; Pakpong Chirarattananon; Sridhar Ravi; Hao Liu
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.704

5.  Forward flight of birds revisited. Part 2: short-term dynamic stability and trim.

Authors:  G Iosilevskii
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Vision and air flow combine to streamline flying honeybees.

Authors:  Gavin J Taylor; Tien Luu; David Ball; Mandyam V Srinivasan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Excess baggage for birds: inappropriate placement of tags on gannets changes flight patterns.

Authors:  Sylvie P Vandenabeele; Edward Grundy; Michael I Friswell; Adam Grogan; Stephen C Votier; Rory P Wilson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Shifts in stability and control effectiveness during evolution of Paraves support aerial maneuvering hypotheses for flight origins.

Authors:  Dennis Evangelista; Sharlene Cam; Tony Huynh; Austin Kwong; Homayun Mehrabani; Kyle Tse; Robert Dudley
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Wing tucks are a response to atmospheric turbulence in the soaring flight of the steppe eagle Aquila nipalensis.

Authors:  Kate V Reynolds; Adrian L R Thomas; Graham K Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Ear-body lift and a novel thrust generating mechanism revealed by the complex wake of brown long-eared bats (Plecotus auritus).

Authors:  L Christoffer Johansson; Jonas Håkansson; Lasse Jakobsen; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.