Literature DB >> 23486444

Elaborate horns in a giant rhinoceros beetle incur negligible aerodynamic costs.

Erin L McCullough1, Bret W Tobalske.   

Abstract

Sexually selected ornaments and weapons are among nature's most extravagant morphologies. Both ornaments and weapons improve a male's reproductive success; yet, unlike ornaments that need only attract females, weapons must be robust and functional structures because they are frequently tested during male-male combat. Consequently, weapons are expected to be particularly costly to bear. Here, we tested the aerodynamic costs of horns in the giant rhinoceros beetle, Trypoxylus dichotomus. We predicted that the long, forked head horn would have three main effects on flight performance: increased body mass, an anterior shift in the centre of mass and increased body drag. We found that the horns were surprisingly lightweight, and therefore had a trivial effect on the male beetles' total mass and mass distribution. Furthermore, because beetles typically fly at slow speeds and high body angles, horns had little effect on total body drag. Together, the weight and the drag of horns increased the overall force required to fly by less than 3 per cent, even in the largest males. Because low-cost structures are expected to be highly evolutionarily labile, the fact that horns incur very minor flight costs may have permitted both the elaboration and diversification of rhinoceros beetle horns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23486444      PMCID: PMC3619469          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.0197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  7 in total

1.  Animal flight dynamics I. Stability in gliding flight.

Authors:  A L Thomas; G K Taylor
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2001-10-07       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Animal flight dynamics II. Longitudinal stability in flapping flight.

Authors:  G K Taylor; A L R Thomas
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2002-02-07       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Contractile activity of the pectoralis in the zebra finch according to mode and velocity of flap-bounding flight.

Authors:  Bret W Tobalske; Lisa A Puccinelli; David C Sheridan
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Aerial performance of stalk-eyed flies that differ in eye span.

Authors:  J G Swallow; G S Wilkinson; J H Marden
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.200

5.  A new low-turbulence wind tunnel for bird flight experiments at Lund University, Sweden

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Free flight maneuvers of stalk-eyed flies: do eye-stalks affect aerial turning behavior?

Authors:  Gal Ribak; John G Swallow
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Flight costs of long, sexually selected tails in hummingbirds.

Authors:  Christopher James Clark; Robert Dudley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 5.349

  7 in total
  9 in total

1.  Cost of flight and the evolution of stag beetle weaponry.

Authors:  Jana Goyens; Sam Van Wassenbergh; Joris Dirckx; Peter Aerts
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Muscle mass drives cost in sexually selected arthropod weapons.

Authors:  Devin M O'Brien; Romain P Boisseau; Meghan Duell; Erin McCullough; Erin C Powell; Ummat Somjee; Sarah Solie; Anthony J Hickey; Gregory I Holwell; Christina J Painting; Douglas J Emlen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The hidden cost of sexually selected traits: the metabolic expense of maintaining a sexually selected weapon.

Authors:  Ummat Somjee; H Arthur Woods; Meghan Duell; Christine W Miller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The evolution of index signals to avoid the cost of dishonesty.

Authors:  Jay M Biernaskie; Alan Grafen; Jennifer C Perry
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Mechanical limits to maximum weapon size in a giant rhinoceros beetle.

Authors:  Erin L McCullough
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Finite-element modelling reveals force modulation of jaw adductors in stag beetles.

Authors:  J Goyens; J Soons; P Aerts; J Dirckx
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  The peacock train does not handicap cursorial locomotor performance.

Authors:  Nathan K Thavarajah; Peter G Tickle; Robert L Nudds; Jonathan R Codd
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Variation in an Extreme Weapon: Horn Performance Differences across Rhinoceros Beetle (Trypoxylus dichotomus) Populations.

Authors:  Benjamin Buchalski; Eric Gutierrez; Douglas Emlen; Laura Lavine; Brook Swanson
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.769

9.  Diverse and complex male polymorphisms in Odontolabis stag beetles (Coleoptera: Lucanidae).

Authors:  Keita Matsumoto; Robert J Knell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.