Literature DB >> 11845251

Modulation of rodent cortical motor excitability by somatosensory input.

Andreas R Luft1, Alain Kaelin-Lang, Till-Karsten Hauser, Manuel M Buitrago, Nitish V Thakor, Daniel F Hanley, Leonardo G Cohen.   

Abstract

It is assumed that somatosensory input is required for motor learning and recovery from focal brain injury. In rodents and other mammals, corticocortical projections between somatosensory and motor cortices are modified by patterned input. Whether and how motor cortex function is modulated by somatosensory input to support motor learning is largely unknown. Recent human evidence suggests that input changes motor excitability. Using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), this study tested whether motor cortex excitability is affected by patterned somatosensory stimulation in rodents. Motor potentials evoked in gastrocnemius muscles in response to TMS (MEP(TMS)) and to cervical electrical stimulation (MEP(CES)) were recorded bilaterally. Initially, the first negative peak of the MEP(TMS) was identified as a cortical component because it disappeared after decortication in three animals. Subsequently, we studied the effects of 2 h of electrical stimulation of one sciatic nerve on the cortical component of the MEP(TMS), i.e., on motor cortex excitability. After stimulation, its amplitude increased by 117 +/- 45% ( P<0.01) in the stimulated limb. A significantly smaller effect was found in the unstimulated limb ( P<0.02) and no effect was observed in unstimulated control animals. The subcortically evoked MEP(CES) were not affected by stimulation. It is concluded that somatosensory input increases motor excitability in rat. This increase outlasts the stimulation period and is mediated by supraspinal structures, likely motor cortex. Modulation of motor cortex excitability by somatosensory input may play a role in motor learning and recovery from lesion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11845251     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-001-0952-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  33 in total

Review 1.  Motor Cortex and Motor Cortical Interhemispheric Communication in Walking After Stroke: The Roles of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Animal Models in Our Current and Future Understanding.

Authors:  Charalambos C Charalambous; Mark G Bowden; DeAnna L Adkins
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.919

2.  Hemicerebellectomy blocks the enhancement of cortical motor output associated with repetitive somatosensory stimulation in the rat.

Authors:  Nordeyn Oulad Ben Taib; Oulad Ben Taib Nordeyn; Mario Manto; Manto Mario; Massimo Pandolfo; Pandolfo Massimo; Jacques Brotchi; Brotchi Jacques
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  Modulation of motor cortex excitability by sustained peripheral stimulation: the interaction between the motor cortex and the cerebellum.

Authors:  Andreas R Luft; Mario-Ubaldo Manto; Nordeyn Oulad Ben Taib
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Effect of finger tracking combined with electrical stimulation on brain reorganization and hand function in subjects with stroke.

Authors:  Ela Bhatt; Ashima Nagpal; Kristine H Greer; Tiffany K Grunewald; Jennifer L Steele; Jeff W Wiemiller; Scott M Lewis; James R Carey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Cerebellum and detection of sequences, from perception to cognition.

Authors:  Marco Molinari; Francesca R Chiricozzi; Silvia Clausi; Anna Maria Tedesco; Mariagrazia De Lisa; Maria G Leggio
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Different effects of tetanic stimulation of facial nerve and ulnar nerve on transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials.

Authors:  Shen Sun; Fu-Bo Tian; Shao-Qang Huang; Jun Zhang; Wei-Min Liang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-03-15

7.  Paired associative transcranial alternating current stimulation increases the excitability of corticospinal projections in humans.

Authors:  Emmet McNickle; Richard G Carson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Lateralization of forelimb motor evoked potentials by transcranial magnetic stimulation in rats.

Authors:  Alexander Rotenberg; Paul A Muller; Andrew M Vahabzadeh-Hagh; Xavier Navarro; Rubèn López-Vales; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Frances Jensen
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-08       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Interaction between repetitive stimulation of the sciatic nerve and functional ablation of cerebellar nucleus interpositus in the rat.

Authors:  Nordeyn Oulad Ben Taib; Marie-Aline Laute; Massimo Pandolfo; Mario-Ubaldo Manto
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.847

10.  Evaluation of the applicability of sevoflurane during post-tetanic myogenic motor evoked potential monitoring in patients undergoing spinal surgery.

Authors:  Hironobu Hayashi; Masahiko Kawaguchi; Ryuichi Abe; Yuri Yamamoto; Satoki Inoue; Munehisa Koizumi; Yoshinori Takakura; Hitoshi Furuya
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 2.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.