Literature DB >> 118436

Sequence and secondary structure of Drosophila melanogaster 5.8S and 2S rRNAs and of the processing site between them.

G N Pavlakis, B R Jordan, R M Wurst, J N Vournakis.   

Abstract

Drosophila melanogaster 5.8S and 2S rRNAs were end-labeled with 32p at either the 5' or 3' end and were sequenced. 5.8S rRNA is 123 nucleotides long and homologous to the 5' part of sequenced 5.8S molecules from other species. 2S rRNA is 30 nucleotides long and homologous to the 3' part of other 5.8S molecules. The 3' end of the 5.8S molecule is able to base-pair with the 5' end of the 2S rRNA to generate a helical region equivalent in position to the "GC-rich hairpin" found in all previously sequenced 5.8S molecules. Probing the structure of the labeled Drosophila 5.8S molecule with S1 nuclease in solution verifies its similarity to other 5.8S rRNAs. The 2S rRNA is shown to form a stable complex with both 5.8S and 26S rRNAs separately and together. 5.8S rRNA can also form either binary or ternary complexes with 2S and 26S rRNA. It is concluded that the 5.8S rRNA in Drosophila melanogaster is very similar both in sequence and structure to other 5.8 rRNAs but is split into two pieces, the 2S rRNA being the 3' part. 2S anchors the 5.8S and 26S rRNA. The order of the rRNA coding regions in the ribosomal DNA repeating unit is shown to be 18S - 5.8S - 2S - 26S. Direct sequencing of ribosomal DNA shows that the 5.8S and 2S regions are separated by a 28 nucleotide spacer which is A-T rich and is presumably removed by a specific processing event. A secondary structure model is proposed for the 26S-5.8S ternary complex and for the presumptive precursor molecule.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 118436      PMCID: PMC342381          DOI: 10.1093/nar/7.8.2213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  42 in total

1.  S1 nuclease hydrolysis of single-stranded nucleic acids with partial double-stranded configuration.

Authors:  G W Rushizky; V A Shaternikov; J H Mozejko; H A Sober
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1975-09-23       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Arrangement of the genes coding for ribosomal ribonucleic acids in Neurospora crassa.

Authors:  S J Free; P W Rice; R L Metzenberg
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Method for predicting RNA secondary structure.

Authors:  J M Pipas; J E McMahon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Structural analyses of mammalian ribosomal ribonucleic acid and its precursors. Nucleotide sequence of ribosomal 5.8 S ribonucleic acid.

Authors:  R N Nazar; T O Sitz; H Busch
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1975-11-25       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  E M Southern
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1975-11-05       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  End labeling of enzymatically decapped mRNA.

Authors:  A Efstratiadis; J N Vournakis; H Donis-Keller; G Chaconas; D K Dougall; F C Kafatos
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Sequence analysis of 5'[32P] labeled mRNA and tRNA using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  R E Lockard; B Alzner-Deweerd; J E Heckman; J MacGee; M W Tabor; U L RajBhandary
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  A new method for sequencing DNA.

Authors:  A M Maxam; W Gilbert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Ribosomal DNA of fly Sciara coprophila has a very small and homogeneous repeat unit.

Authors:  R Renkawitz; S A Gerbi; K H Glätzer
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1979-05-23

10.  Nucleotide sequence and conserved features of the 5.8 S rRNA coding region of Neurospora crassa.

Authors:  E Selker; C Yanofsky
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1979-06-11       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  66 in total

1.  What causes the aphid 28S rRNA to lack the hidden break?

Authors:  K Ogino; H Eda-Fujiwara; H Fujiwara; H Ishikawa
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Sequence of 5.8S ribosomal RNA in the mosquito, Culex tritaeniorhynchus.

Authors:  T Shimada; Y Sasaki
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1991-10-11       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  Specialized ribosomes: a new frontier in gene regulation and organismal biology.

Authors:  Shifeng Xue; Maria Barna
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 94.444

4.  A family of wheat embryo U2 snRNAs.

Authors:  J M Skuzeski; J J Jendrisak
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 4.076

5.  Genome-wide analysis reveals distinct substrate specificities of Rrp6, Dis3, and core exosome subunits.

Authors:  Daniel L Kiss; Erik D Andrulis
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 4.942

6.  Nucleotide sequence and presumed secondary structure of the 28S rRNA of pea aphid: implication for diversification of insect rRNA.

Authors:  D Amako; O Y Kwon; H Ishikawa
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  rRNA processing: removal of only nineteen bases at the gap between 28S alpha and 28S beta rRNAs in Sciara coprophila.

Authors:  V C Ware; R Renkawitz; S A Gerbi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1985-05-24       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Molecular mechanism of introduction of the hidden break into the 28S rRNA of insects: implication based on structural studies.

Authors:  H Fujiwara; H Ishikawa
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1986-08-26       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Separation and sequence of the 3' termini of M double-stranded RNA from killer yeast.

Authors:  D J Thiele; R W Wang; M J Leibowitz
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1982-03-11       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  An evaluation of the phylogenetic position of the dinoflagellate Crypthecodinium cohnii based on 5S rRNA characterization.

Authors:  A G Hinnebusch; L C Klotz; R L Blanken; A R Loeblich
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.