BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the specificity of some reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays for the detection of residual tumor cells in breast cancer patients. The following markers have been analysed: carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratins (CK19 and CK20), polymorphic epithelial mucin (MUC-1), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), maspin, and mammaglobin. RT-PCR was employed to detect breast cancer cells in peripheral blood (PB), bone marrow (BM), and stem cell leukoaphereses (PBPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated the specificity of our RT-PCR assays on a panel of breast cancer specimens (n = 30), on PBPC in patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (n = 38), on BM (n = 7) and PB (n = 5) samples obtained from patients with breast cancer. Marrow cells, PB, and PBPC from normal subjects or hematological tumor patients were tested as negative controls. RESULTS: Only maspin and mammaglobin met the criteria of sensitivity and specificity required for the detection of residual disease; they were expressed in 80% and 97% of breast cancer specimens, respectively, and not expressed in normal controls. CK19, CK20. EGFR, MUC-1, and CEA were sometimes expressed in normal blood cells and/or hematological tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the notion that maspin and mammaglobin are useful markers for RT-PCR detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in breast cancer patients, and that perspective clinical studies are needed to determine wether RT-PCR assays will be useful in assessing prognosis, tailoring therapy, or developing new strategies for ex vivo purging.
BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the specificity of some reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays for the detection of residual tumor cells in breast cancerpatients. The following markers have been analysed: carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratins (CK19 and CK20), polymorphic epithelial mucin (MUC-1), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), maspin, and mammaglobin. RT-PCR was employed to detect breast cancer cells in peripheral blood (PB), bone marrow (BM), and stem cell leukoaphereses (PBPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated the specificity of our RT-PCR assays on a panel of breast cancer specimens (n = 30), on PBPC in patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (n = 38), on BM (n = 7) and PB (n = 5) samples obtained from patients with breast cancer. Marrow cells, PB, and PBPC from normal subjects or hematological tumorpatients were tested as negative controls. RESULTS: Only maspin and mammaglobin met the criteria of sensitivity and specificity required for the detection of residual disease; they were expressed in 80% and 97% of breast cancer specimens, respectively, and not expressed in normal controls. CK19, CK20. EGFR, MUC-1, and CEA were sometimes expressed in normal blood cells and/or hematological tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the notion that maspin and mammaglobin are useful markers for RT-PCR detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in breast cancerpatients, and that perspective clinical studies are needed to determine wether RT-PCR assays will be useful in assessing prognosis, tailoring therapy, or developing new strategies for ex vivo purging.
Authors: Barbara K Zehentner; Heather Secrist; Dawn C Hayes; Xinqun Zhang; Richard C Ostenson; Steven Loop; Gary Goodman; Raymond L Houghton; David H Persing Journal: Mol Diagn Ther Date: 2006 Impact factor: 4.074
Authors: Yousri M Hussein; Amal F Gharib; Rasha L Etewa; Amal S El-Shal; Mohamed Esmat Abdel-Ghany; Wael H Elsawy Journal: Mol Cell Biochem Date: 2011-01-25 Impact factor: 3.396
Authors: A Ballestrero; A Garuti; M Bertolotto; I Rocco; D Boy; A Nencioni; L Ottonello; F Patrone Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2005-05-23 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Michael P Raynor; Sally-Anne Stephenson; Kenneth B Pittman; David C A Walsh; Michael A Henderson; Alexander Dobrovic Journal: J Hematol Oncol Date: 2009-06-05 Impact factor: 17.388
Authors: I Van der Auwera; D Peeters; I H Benoy; H J Elst; S J Van Laere; A Prové; H Maes; P Huget; P van Dam; P B Vermeulen; L Y Dirix Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-12-01 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: I H Benoy; H Elst; I Van der Auwera; S Van Laere; P van Dam; E Van Marck; S Scharpé; P B Vermeulen; L Y Dirix Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2004-11-15 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: I H Benoy; H Elst; M Philips; H Wuyts; P Van Dam; S Scharpé; E Van Marck; P B Vermeulen; L Y Dirix Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2006-03-13 Impact factor: 7.640