Literature DB >> 11840293

Positron emission tomography with [18F]2-fluoro-D-2-deoxyglucose (FDG-PET) predicts relapse of malignant lymphoma after high-dose therapy with stem cell transplantation.

A Becherer1, M Mitterbauer, U Jaeger, P Kalhs, H T Greinix, G Karanikas, C Pötzi, M Raderer, R Dudczak, K Kletter.   

Abstract

We have determined the predictive value of [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose (FDG-PET) in patients with Hodgkin's disease (HD) and aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) scheduled for high-dose therapy with stem cell transplantation (HDT/SCT). Inclusion criteria were the presence of an FDG-PET scan after chemotherapy (ChT) within 8 weeks prior to HDT/SCT and available follow-up data. Sixteen patients (10 NHL and six HD) were observed during a follow-up period of 4 to 28 months (median 13 months). Before SCT, five patients had a negative PET, three were weakly positive, two moderately positive, and six strongly positive. None of the five patients with a negative PET before HDT/SCT relapsed and two of three patients with a weakly positive scan are still in remission after HDT/SCT. Of eight patients with a moderate or high positive PET before HDT/SCT, seven relapsed and one died of early HDT/SCT related complications (P< 0.01). Three of eight relapsing patients died of lymphoma 5 to 10 months after SCT and in one additional patient not responding to HDT/SCT, the main cause of death was chronic toxicity 4 months after transplantation. After 12 months, in PET-negative patients the overall and relapse-free survival was 100%, in PET-positive patients 55% and 18%, respectively. In NHL, two patients with negative PET, but with an age-adjusted international prognostic index (AaIPI) of 2 and one with AaIPI = 1 are still in remission. In the seven PET-positive subjects, one patient with AaIPI = 0, three with AaIPI = 1, and two with AaIPI = 2 relapsed. We conclude that FDG-PET is accurate in the prediction of relapse prior to HDT/SCT in patients with lymphoma. It provides additional information when compared with the AaIPI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11840293     DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


  26 in total

Review 1.  Impact of technology on the utilisation of positron emission tomography in lymphoma: current and future perspectives.

Authors:  D Visvikis; P J Ell
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Positron emission tomography in the management of lymphomas: a summary.

Authors:  M J O'Doherty; P J Hoskin
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-04-12       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in response assessment before high-dose chemotherapy for lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Teruhiko Terasawa; Issa J Dahabreh; Takashi Nihashi
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-06-29

Review 4.  PET in lymphoma.

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 5.  Molecular imaging of brain tumors: a bridge between clinical and molecular medicine?

Authors:  B J Schaller; M Modo; M Buchfelder
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Staging with PET and the "Will Rogers" effect: redefining prognosis and survival in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Sandip Basu; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  FDG PET and risk-adapted therapy in Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Yvette L Kasamon; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.645

8.  Investigating the existence of quantum metabolic values in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma by 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Ching-yee Oliver Wong; Joseph Thie; Kelly J Parling-Lynch; Dana Zakalik; Regina H Wong; Marianne Gaskill; Jeffrey H Margolis; Jack Hill; Ammar Sukari; Surya Chundru; Darlene Fink-Bennett; Conrad Nagle
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 9.  Unifying the predictive value of pretransplant FDG PET in patients with lymphoma: a review and meta-analysis of published trials.

Authors:  Loukia S Poulou; Loukas Thanos; Panayiotis D Ziakas
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  PET/CT in oncology: for which tumours is it the reference standard?

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.