Literature DB >> 11838774

Possible consequences of genes of major effect: transient changes in the G-matrix.

A F Agrawal1, E D Brodie, L H Rieseberg.   

Abstract

Understanding the process of evolutionary divergence requires knowledge of the strength, form, and targets of selection, as well as the genetic architecture of the divergent traits. Quantitative genetic approaches to understanding multivariate selection and genetic response to selection have proven to be powerful tools in this endeavor, particularly with respect to short-term evolution. However, the application of quantitative genetic theory over periods of substantial phenotypic change is controversial because it requires that the requisite genetic parameters remain constant over the period of time in question. We show herein how attempts to determine the stability of key genetic parameters may be misled by the 'many genes of small effect' type of genetic architecture generally assumed in quantitative genetics. The presence of genes of major effect (GOMEs) can alter the genetic variance-covariance matrix dramatically for brief periods of time, significantly alter the rate and trajectory of multivariate evolution, and thereby mislead attempts to reconstruct or predict long term evolution.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11838774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  17 in total

1.  Rapid appearance of epistasis during adaptive divergence following colonization.

Authors:  Scott P Carroll; Hugh Dingle; Thomas R Famula
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Quantitative genetics of functional characters in Drosophila melanogaster populations subjected to laboratory selection.

Authors:  Henrique Teotónio; Margarida Matos; Michael R Rose
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  MIPoD: a hypothesis-testing framework for microevolutionary inference from patterns of divergence.

Authors:  Paul A Hohenlohe; Stevan J Arnold
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Characterizing the evolution of genetic variance using genetic covariance tensors.

Authors:  Emma Hine; Stephen F Chenoweth; Howard D Rundle; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Polymorphic genes of major effect: consequences for variation, selection and evolution in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  John R Stinchcombe; Cynthia Weinig; Katy D Heath; Marcus T Brock; Johanna Schmitt
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Selective sweep at a quantitative trait locus in the presence of background genetic variation.

Authors:  Luis-Miguel Chevin; Frédéric Hospital
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Rapid evolution caused by pollinator loss in Mimulus guttatus.

Authors:  Sarah A Bodbyl Roels; John K Kelly
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Repeated modification of early limb morphogenesis programmes underlies the convergence of relative limb length in Anolis lizards.

Authors:  Thomas J Sanger; Liam J Revell; Jeremy J Gibson-Brown; Jonathan B Losos
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Reconstructing the history of selection during homoploid hybrid speciation.

Authors:  Sophie Karrenberg; Christian Lexer; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Limited plasticity in the phenotypic variance-covariance matrix for male advertisement calls in the black field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus.

Authors:  W R Pitchers; R Brooks; M D Jennions; T Tregenza; I Dworkin; J Hunt
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 2.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.