Literature DB >> 12952643

Rapid appearance of epistasis during adaptive divergence following colonization.

Scott P Carroll1, Hugh Dingle, Thomas R Famula.   

Abstract

Theory predicts that short-term adaptation within populations depends on additive (A) genetic effects, while gene-gene interactions 'epistasis (E)' are important only in long-term evolution. However, few data exist on the genetic architecture of adaptive variation, and the relative importance of A versus non-additive genetic effects continues to be a central controversy of evolutionary biology after more than 70 years of debate. To examine this issue directly, we conducted hybridization experiments between two populations of wild soapberry bugs that have strongly differentiated in 100 or fewer generations following a host plant shift. Contrary to expectation, we found that between-population E and dominance (D) have appeared quickly in the evolution of new phenotypes. Rather than thousands of generations, adaptive gene differences between populations have evolved in tens. Such complex genetic variation could underlie the seemingly extreme rates of evolution that are increasingly reported in many taxa. In the case of the soapberry bug, extraordinary ecological opportunity, rather than mortality, may have created hard selection for genetic variants. Because ultimate division of populations into genetic species depends on epistatic loss of hybrid compatibility, local adaptation based on E may accelerate macro-evolutionary diversification.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12952643      PMCID: PMC1698009          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  9 in total

1.  Rapid evolution of reproductive isolation in the wild: evidence from introduced salmon.

Authors:  A P Hendry; J K Wenburg; P Bentzen; E C Volk; T P Quinn
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-10-20       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  The ongoing synthesis: a reply to Coyne, Barton, and Turelli.

Authors:  C J Goodnight; M J Wade
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 3.  Is Wright's shifting balance process important in evolution?

Authors:  J A Coyne; N H Barton; M Turelli
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Genetic architecture of adaptive differentiation in evolving host races of the soapberry bug, Jadera haematoloma.

Authors:  S P Carroll; H Dingle; T R Famula; C W Fox
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  Possible consequences of genes of major effect: transient changes in the G-matrix.

Authors:  A F Agrawal; E D Brodie; L H Rieseberg
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Epistasis, complex traits, and mapping genes.

Authors:  M J Wade
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.082

7.  Heritability of fitness in a wild mammal population.

Authors:  L E Kruuk; T H Clutton-Brock; J Slate; J M Pemberton; S Brotherstone; F E Guinness
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components.

Authors:  T A Mousseau; D A Roff
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Lifetime Reproductive Success and Heritability in Nature.

Authors:  J Merilä; B C Sheldon
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.926

  9 in total
  16 in total

1.  The selective values of alleles in a molecular network model are context dependent.

Authors:  Jean Peccoud; Kent Vander Velden; Dean Podlich; Chris Winkler; Lane Arthur; Mark Cooper
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Rapid evolution of osmoregulatory function by modification of gene transcription in steelhead trout.

Authors:  Tutku Aykanat; Frank P Thrower; Daniel D Heath
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Statistical epistasis is a generic feature of gene regulatory networks.

Authors:  Arne B Gjuvsland; Ben J Hayes; Stig W Omholt; Orjan Carlborg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-10-08       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Key questions in the genetics and genomics of eco-evolutionary dynamics.

Authors:  A P Hendry
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  How does parental environment influence the potential for adaptation to global change?

Authors:  Evatt Chirgwin; Dustin J Marshall; Carla M Sgrò; Keyne Monro
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Divergent egg physiologies in two closely related grasshopper species: Taeniopoda eques versus Romalea microptera (Orthoptera: Romaleidae).

Authors:  Timothy W Stauffer; John D Hatle; Douglas W Whitman
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.377

7.  Additive, non-additive and maternal effects of cytokine transcription in response to immunostimulation with Vibrio vaccine in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha).

Authors:  Tutku Aykanat; John W Heath; Brian Dixon; Daniel D Heath
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 2.846

8.  Potential limits to the benefits of admixture during biological invasion.

Authors:  Brittany S Barker; Janelle E Cocio; Samantha R Anderson; Joseph E Braasch; Feng A Cang; Heather D Gillette; Katrina M Dlugosch
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Epistasis underlying a fitness trait within a natural population of the pitcher-plant mosquito, Wyeomyia smithii.

Authors:  William E Bradshaw; Brian P Haggerty; Christina M Holzapfel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Conciliation biology: the eco-evolutionary management of permanently invaded biotic systems.

Authors:  Scott P Carroll
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.