Literature DB >> 11835510

Why protein R-factors are so large: a self-consistent analysis.

Dennis Vitkup1, Dagmar Ringe, Martin Karplus, Gregory A Petsko.   

Abstract

The R-factor and R-free are commonly used to measure the quality of protein models obtained in X-ray crystallography. Well-refined protein structures usually have R-factors in the range of 20-25%, whereas intrinsic errors in the experimental data are usually around 5%. We use molecular dynamics simulations to perform a self-consistent analysis by which we determine the major factors contributing to large values of protein R-factors. The analysis shows that significant R-factor values can arise from the use of isotropic B-factors to model anisotropic protein motions and from coordinate errors. Even in the absence of coordinate errors, the use of isotropic B-factors can cause the R-factors to be around 10%; for coordinate errors smaller than 0.2 A, the two errors types make similar contributions. The inaccuracy of the energy function used and multistate protein dynamics are unlikely to make significant contributions to the large R-factors. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11835510     DOI: 10.1002/prot.10035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  22 in total

1.  Normal mode refinement of anisotropic thermal parameters for a supramolecular complex at 3.42-A crystallographic resolution.

Authors:  Billy K Poon; Xiaorui Chen; Mingyang Lu; Nand K Vyas; Florante A Quiocho; Qinghua Wang; Jianpeng Ma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Ensemble refinement of protein crystal structures: validation and application.

Authors:  Elena J Levin; Dmitry A Kondrashov; Gary E Wesenberg; George N Phillips
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.006

3.  Molecular dynamics simulation of triclinic lysozyme in a crystal lattice.

Authors:  Pawel A Janowski; Chunmei Liu; Jason Deckman; David A Case
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Systematic analysis of residual density suggests that a major limitation in well-refined X-ray structures of proteins is the omission of ordered solvent.

Authors:  Jimin Wang
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 5.  X-ray Scattering Studies of Protein Structural Dynamics.

Authors:  Steve P Meisburger; William C Thomas; Maxwell B Watkins; Nozomi Ando
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  On the variability of experimental data in macromolecular crystallography.

Authors:  Edwin Pozharski
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2012-08-18

Review 7.  E pluribus unum, no more: from one crystal, many conformations.

Authors:  Rahel A Woldeyes; David A Sivak; James S Fraser
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 6.809

8.  Ensemble MD simulations restrained via crystallographic data: accurate structure leads to accurate dynamics.

Authors:  Yi Xue; Nikolai R Skrynnikov
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  X-ray radiation-induced addition of oxygen atoms to protein residues.

Authors:  Jimin Wang
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Target flexibility: an emerging consideration in drug discovery and design.

Authors:  Pietro Cozzini; Glen E Kellogg; Francesca Spyrakis; Donald J Abraham; Gabriele Costantino; Andrew Emerson; Francesca Fanelli; Holger Gohlke; Leslie A Kuhn; Garrett M Morris; Modesto Orozco; Thelma A Pertinhez; Menico Rizzi; Christoph A Sotriffer
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 7.446

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.