Literature DB >> 1183500

Optokinetic nystagmus during selective retinal stimulation.

M Cheng, J S Outerbridge.   

Abstract

Nystagmic eye movements in response to selective optokinetic stimulation of different parts of the retina were studied in normal human subjects by two methods: 1. a digital computer controlled by the eye movement signal was used to generate an optokinetic display which stimulated only the peripheral retina, simulating a central scotoma, and 2. a single dot of 0.6 degrees in diameter was used as the stimulus during maintained forward gaze. The results show that stimulation of the central or peripheral retina alone can produce optokinetic nystagmus in man, and that essentially the same type of nystagmus is produced in both cases. The slow phase velocity of nystagmus evoked from the peripheral retina falls off rapidly with distance from the fovea but can be facilitated by attention. Results are compared with other findings and a possible explanation is offered for the observed variation in slow phase speed which occurs during constant velocity optokinetic stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1183500     DOI: 10.1007/bf00235455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  8 in total

1.  Anomalies in the recorded movements of the eye during optokinetic rotatory and caloric stimulation in normal subjects.

Authors:  K McLAY; M F MADIGAN; F C ORMEROD
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1957-06       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  On the central mechanism of some optic reactions.

Authors:  G G J RADEMAKER; J W G TER BRAAK
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1948-03       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Computer-generated optokinetic display.

Authors:  M Cheng; J S Duterbridge
Journal:  Med Biol Eng       Date:  1974-07

4.  Frequency content of nystagmus.

Authors:  M Cheng; R P Gannon; J S Outerbridge
Journal:  Aerosp Med       Date:  1973-04

5.  Optokinetic eye movements in the rabbit: input-output relations.

Authors:  H Collewijn
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Retino-tectal and cortico-tectal projections in Macaca mulatta.

Authors:  M E Wilson; M J Toyne
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1970-12-18       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  The optokinetic response under open and closed loop conditions in the monkey.

Authors:  F Koerner; P H Schiller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Observations upon the neurological mechanism of optokinetic nystagmus with especial reference to the contribution of peripheral vision.

Authors:  J D Hood
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1967 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 1.494

  8 in total
  32 in total

1.  Pursuit eye movements and their neural control in the monkey.

Authors:  R Eckmiller; M Mackeben
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1978-10-18       Impact factor: 3.657

2.  Interaction of active and passive slow eye movement systems.

Authors:  R Worfolk; G R Barnes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Suppression of optokinesis by a stabilized target: effects of instruction and stimulus frequency.

Authors:  J Pola; H J Wyatt; M Lustgarten
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-08

4.  Induced motion of a fixated target: influence of voluntary eye deviation.

Authors:  T Heckmann; R B Post; L Deering
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-09

5.  Optokinetic nystagmus in patients with central scotomas in age related macular degeneration.

Authors:  C Valmaggia; J Charlier; I Gottlob
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  A reevaluation of the effect of velocity on induced motion.

Authors:  R B Post; D Chi; T Heckmann; M Chaderjian
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-05

7.  Suppression of OKN and VOR by afterimages and imaginary objects.

Authors:  I P Howard; D Giaschi; C M Murasugi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The oculomotor "twitch"--a transient response to target motion.

Authors:  H J Wyatt; J Pola; M Lustgarten
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Induced motion and apparent straight ahead during prolonged stimulation.

Authors:  R B Post; T Heckmann
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-10

10.  Decreased visual performance resulting from temporal uncertainty, target movement, and background movement.

Authors:  K W Gish; J B Sheehy; H W Leibowitz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.