BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In carotid artery stent placement, marked oversizing of the stent relative to the internal carotid artery lumen is common. This study was performed to determine the influence of using oversized self-expanding nitinol stents on neointimal hyperplasia. METHODS: In six greyhound dogs, 24 self-expanding nitinol stents (eight SMART stents, eight Easy Wallstents, eight Sinus-Flex stents) were inserted into both common carotid arteries (CCAs). In each CCA, two stents were deployed; a stent of the appropriate diameter was implanted distally and an oversized stent proximally. After 4 months, transverse sections of each stent were examined histologically and at computerized image analysis. Neointimal hyperplasia was determined as the proportion of the residual diameter of the patent vessel lumen compared with the stent lumen. RESULTS: The amount of neointimal hyperplasia did not differ between the normal-sized and oversized stents. The mean preserved luminal diameter (+/-SEM) with normal- and oversized stents, respectively, were as follows: Easy Wallstent, 94% +/- 1.0 and 96% +/- 1.5; SMART stent, 92% +/- 1.6 and 93% +/- 1.8; and Sinus-Flex stent, 93% +/- 2.7 and 93% +/- 2.6. The mean preserved patent lumen with the 12 normal-sized stents (93% +/-1.0) was not significantly different from that of the 12 oversized stents (94% +/- 1.1, P =.502). CONCLUSION: Under experimental conditions, use of self-expanding stents oversized by 30-40% appeared to result in neointimal hyperplasia comparable to that caused by normal-sized stents. All three stent types appeared to have similarly low neointimal responses.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In carotid artery stent placement, marked oversizing of the stent relative to the internal carotid artery lumen is common. This study was performed to determine the influence of using oversized self-expanding nitinol stents on neointimal hyperplasia. METHODS: In six greyhound dogs, 24 self-expanding nitinol stents (eight SMART stents, eight Easy Wallstents, eight Sinus-Flex stents) were inserted into both common carotid arteries (CCAs). In each CCA, two stents were deployed; a stent of the appropriate diameter was implanted distally and an oversized stent proximally. After 4 months, transverse sections of each stent were examined histologically and at computerized image analysis. Neointimal hyperplasia was determined as the proportion of the residual diameter of the patent vessel lumen compared with the stent lumen. RESULTS: The amount of neointimal hyperplasia did not differ between the normal-sized and oversized stents. The mean preserved luminal diameter (+/-SEM) with normal- and oversized stents, respectively, were as follows: Easy Wallstent, 94% +/- 1.0 and 96% +/- 1.5; SMART stent, 92% +/- 1.6 and 93% +/- 1.8; and Sinus-Flex stent, 93% +/- 2.7 and 93% +/- 2.6. The mean preserved patent lumen with the 12 normal-sized stents (93% +/-1.0) was not significantly different from that of the 12 oversized stents (94% +/- 1.1, P =.502). CONCLUSION: Under experimental conditions, use of self-expanding stents oversized by 30-40% appeared to result in neointimal hyperplasia comparable to that caused by normal-sized stents. All three stent types appeared to have similarly low neointimal responses.
Authors: S N Oesterle; R Whitbourn; P J Fitzgerald; A C Yeung; S H Stertzer; M D Dake; P G Yock; R Virmani Journal: Am Heart J Date: 1998-10 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: K Schürmann; D Vorwerk; A Kulisch; E Stroehmer-Kulisch; S Biesterfeld; T Stopinski; R W Günther Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 1996 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: E C Kirsch; M S Khangure; G P van Schie; M M Lawrence-Brown; E G Stewart-Wynne; W McAuliffe Journal: Radiology Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Hu Li; Seung-Woon Rha; Byoung Geol Choi; Se Yeon Choi; Sang Ki Moon; Won Young Jang; Woohyeun Kim; Ji Hun Ahn; Sang-Ho Park; Woong Gil Choi; Rui Feng Yang; Wen Wei Bai; Cheol Ung Choi; Yang Gi Ryu; Man Jong Baek; Dong Joo Oh Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2021-06-30 Impact factor: 2.298