Literature DB >> 11526276

Carotid arterial stent placement: results and follow-up in 53 patients.

E C Kirsch1, M S Khangure, G P van Schie, M M Lawrence-Brown, E G Stewart-Wynne, W McAuliffe.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the results, complications, and follow-up data after stent placement for occlusive internal carotid arterial disease and to compare the results with those in the literature.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Carotid arterial stent placement was attempted in 57 arteries in 53 patients. Thirty-six (68%) of 53 patients were symptomatic. Forty-two (79%) of 53 patients had one to three clinically important comorbidities and were considered at high risk. All patients underwent pre- and postprocedural independent neurologic examinations. Follow-up consisted of serial duplex ultrasonography and clinical assessment.
RESULTS: The immediate technical success rate of stent deployment was 97%. Periprocedurally, three (three [5%] of 57 interventions) transient ischemic attacks and three (three [5%] of 57 interventions) minor strokes occurred. Two deaths occurred in the first 30 days (one myocardial infarction, one renal failure). One ipsilateral major stroke occurred 3 weeks after the procedure. The 30-day ipsilateral major stroke and death rate was 5% (three of 57 interventions). At 30 days, one of three patients with minor stroke had mild residual dysphasia. Treatment remained clinically successful in 48 (96%) of 50 patients. The restenosis rate was 4% (two patients).
CONCLUSION: Carotid arterial stent placement in a high-risk population has morbidity and mortality rates comparable to those of carotid endarterectomy in a lower risk population. Carotid arterial stent placement can be performed with a low restenosis rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11526276     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2203001313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  4 in total

1.  Quality improvement guidelines for the performance of cervical carotid angioplasty and stent placement.

Authors:  John D Barr; John J Connors; David Sacks; Joan C Wojak; Gary J Becker; John F Cardella; Bohdan Chopko; Jacques E Dion; Allan J Fox; Randall T Higashida; Robert W Hurst; Curtis A Lewis; Terence A S Matalon; Gary M Nesbit; J Arliss Pollock; Eric J Russell; David J Seidenwurm; Robert C Wallace
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Oversizing of self-expanding stents: influence on the development of neointimal hyperplasia of the carotid artery in a canine model.

Authors:  Eberhard C Kirsch; Mark S Khangure; Philip Morling; Terry J York; William McAuliffe
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  MR and clinical follow-up of diffusion-weighted cerebral lesions after carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Elke A M Hauth; Christian Jansen; Robert Drescher; Michael Schwartz; Michael Forsting; Horst J Jaeger; Klaus D Mathias
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Safety and efficacy of the Perclose suture-mediated closure device following carotid artery stenting under clopidogrel platelet blockade.

Authors:  Niels Zorger; Thomas Finkenzeller; Markus Lenhart; Okka Hamer; Christian Paetzel; Inghita Borisch; Ingolf Toepel; Stefan Feuerbach; Johann Link
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-11       Impact factor: 5.315

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.