Literature DB >> 6927515

Preferences for health states: a review of measurement methods.

G W Torrance.   

Abstract

The preferences of patients and the public for program outcomes are an important component of program evaluation. This paper reviews methods of measuring such preferences. Topics discussed include the description of the relevant health states, the selection of appropriate subjects, the types of preference scales available and the various preference measurement methods which can be used. The three most common preference measurement techniques--rating scales, standard gamble and time trade-off--are described in detail. The application to both temporary and chronic states is presented, including the case of chronic states considered worse than death. Findings regarding the accuracy of the techniques are summarized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6927515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mead Johnson Symp Perinat Dev Med        ISSN: 0190-0749


  9 in total

1.  Time trade-off utility modified to accommodate degenerative and life-threatening conditions.

Authors:  M W Kattan; P A Fearn; B J Miles
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001

2.  Predictors of health-related quality-of-life utilities among persons with posttraumatic stress disorder.

Authors:  Jason N Doctor; Lori A Zoellner; Norah C Feeny
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 3.  Stakeholders in outcome measures: review from a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Mark R Brinker; Daniel P O'Connor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Optimal strategy for the first episode of primary spontaneous pneumothorax in young men. A decision analysis.

Authors:  Takeshi Morimoto; Tsuguya Fukui; Hiroshi Koyama; Yoshinori Noguchi; Takuro Shimbo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Health-related quality of life anticipated with different management strategies for febrile neutropenia in adult cancer patients.

Authors:  O Teuffel; S Cheng; M C Ethier; C Diorio; J Martino; C Mayo; R Wing; L Sung; S M H Alibhai
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Stability of time trade-off utilities for health states associated with the treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christopher S Saigal; Jeffrey Gornbein; Kristen Reid; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  Using patient values and preferences to inform the importance of health outcomes in practice guideline development following the GRADE approach.

Authors:  Yuan Zhang; Pablo Alonso Coello; Jan Brożek; Wojtek Wiercioch; Itziar Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta; Elie A Akl; Joerg J Meerpohl; Waleed Alhazzani; Alonso Carrasco-Labra; Rebecca L Morgan; Reem A Mustafa; John J Riva; Ainsley Moore; Juan José Yepes-Nuñez; Carlos Cuello-Garcia; Zulfa AlRayees; Veena Manja; Maicon Falavigna; Ignacio Neumann; Romina Brignardello-Petersen; Nancy Santesso; Bram Rochwerg; Andrea Darzi; Maria Ximena Rojas; Yaser Adi; Claudia Bollig; Reem Waziry; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  When outcome is a balance: methods to measure combined utility for the choice between induction of labour and expectant management in mild risk pregnancy at term.

Authors:  Denise Bijlenga; Erwin Birnie; Ben W J Mol; Gouke J Bonsel
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  People in states worse than dead according to the EQ-5D UK value set: would they rather be dead?

Authors:  Lars Bernfort; Björn Gerdle; Magnus Husberg; Lars-Åke Levin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 4.147

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.