Literature DB >> 22071623

Gender, educational and age differences in meanings that underlie global self-rated health.

Wim Peersman1, Dirk Cambier, Jan De Maeseneer, Sara Willems.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The single-item question on self-rated health has been widely used in surveys. This study aims to explore which frames of reference are used by respondents when answering this question, to describe differences in the used frame of reference according to gender, educational background and age, and to determine whether subgroup differences can be explained by differences in prior health experiences.
METHODS: Face-to-face interviews were conducted in a sample of 310 adults who were asked to rate their health using a single-item question with closed-ended answering categories and to explain the reasons for the rating they gave with open-ended probes. Different indicators of prior health experiences were taken into account.
RESULTS: Physical health problems were the most utilized referents. However, participants also mentioned reasons that go beyond the physical dimension of health. Subgroup differences were found. Prior health experiences partly explained subgroup differences for some referents, but not for others.
CONCLUSIONS: Investigators using the single question on self-rated health for comparing health across different population groups should be aware that the meaning of the question varies across different socio-demographic groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22071623     DOI: 10.1007/s00038-011-0320-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Public Health        ISSN: 1661-8556            Impact factor:   3.380


  36 in total

1.  Social and cultural meanings of self-rated health: Arab immigrants in the United States.

Authors:  Sawsan Abdulrahim; Kristine Ajrouch
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2010-05-12

2.  The reliability of the Minimum European Health Module.

Authors:  Bianca Cox; Herman van Oyen; Emmanuelle Cambois; Carol Jagger; Sophie le Roy; Jean-Marie Robine; Isabelle Romieu
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  Differential health reporting by education level and its impact on the measurement of health inequalities among older Europeans.

Authors:  Teresa Bago d'Uva; Owen O'Donnell; Eddy van Doorslaer
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-08-02       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Assessing reliability of a measure of self-rated health.

Authors:  O Lundberg; K Manderbacka
Journal:  Scand J Soc Med       Date:  1996-09

Review 5.  Self-ratings of health: do they also predict change in functional ability?

Authors:  E L Idler; S V Kasl
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  The meaning of older adults' health appraisals: congruence with health status and determinant of mortality.

Authors:  E A Borawski; J M Kinney; E Kahana
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.077

7.  How is your health in general? A qualitative study on self-assessed health.

Authors:  J G Simon; J B De Boer; I M A Joung; H Bosma; J P Mackenbach
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.367

8.  Sociodemographics, self-rated health, and mortality in the US.

Authors:  Peter Franks; Marthe R Gold; Kevin Fiscella
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Concepts of self-rated health: specifying the gender difference in mortality risk.

Authors:  Dorly J H Deeg; Didi M W Kriegsman
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2003-06

10.  What is self-rated health and why does it predict mortality? Towards a unified conceptual model.

Authors:  Marja Jylhä
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  10 in total

1.  Are Single-Item Global Ratings Useful for Assessing Health Status?

Authors:  Cathaleene Macias; Paul B Gold; Dost Öngür; Bruce M Cohen; Trishan Panch
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2015-10-22

2.  Gender and the structure of self-rated health across the adult life span.

Authors:  Anna Zajacova; Snehalata Huzurbazar; Megan Todd
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Age Effects of Frames of Reference in Self-reports of Health, Well-being, Fatigue and Pain.

Authors:  Ania Filus; Doerte U Junghaenel; Stefan Schneider; Joan E Broderick; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  Appl Res Qual Life       Date:  2018-12-03

4.  Do conceptualisations of health differ across social strata? A concept mapping study among lay people.

Authors:  Karien Stronks; Nancy Hoeymans; Beatrijs Haverkamp; Frank R J den Hertog; Marja J H van Bon-Martens; Henrike Galenkamp; Marcel Verweij; Hans A M van Oers
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Health Measurement and Health Inequality Over the Life Course: A Comparison of Self-rated Health, SF-12, and Grip Strength.

Authors:  Liliya Leopold
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2019-04

6.  Depression Fully Mediates the Effect of Multimorbidity on Self-Rated Health for Economically Disadvantaged African American Men but Not Women.

Authors:  Shervin Assari; James Smith; Mohsen Bazargan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Does the single-item self-rated health measure the same thing across different wordings? Construct validity study.

Authors:  Stéphane Cullati; Naike Bochatay; Clémentine Rossier; Idris Guessous; Claudine Burton-Jeangros; Delphine S Courvoisier
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Is the single self-rated health item reliable in India? A construct validity study.

Authors:  Stéphane Cullati; Simantini Mukhopadhyay; Stefan Sieber; Achin Chakraborty; Claudine Burton-Jeangros
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2018-11-09

9.  To what extent do socioeconomic inequalities in SRH reflect inequalities in burden of disease? The HELIUS study.

Authors:  Henrike Galenkamp; Hans van Oers; Karien Stronks
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.341

10.  Diverging ideas of health? Comparing the basis of health ratings across gender, age, and country.

Authors:  Patrick Lazarevič; Martina Brandt
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 4.634

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.