Literature DB >> 11819141

Discrepancy between decreases in the amplitude of compound muscle action potential and loss of motor function caused by ischemic and compressive insults to the spinal cord.

Yukihiro Nakagawa1, Tetsuya Tamaki, Hiroshi Yamada, Hiroaki Nishiura.   

Abstract

We examined the relationship between decreases in the amplitude of the compound muscle action potential (CMAP), caused by ischemic and compressive insults to the spinal cord, and postoperative motor deficits. Results were compared with those for other evoked potentials commonly used for multimodal monitoring of the spinal cord. CMAP was more sensitive than the other evoked potentials employed to ischemic and compressive insults to the spinal cord, although the disappearance of CMAP did not always result in a residual motor deficit. A decrease of more than 50% in the amplitude of the motor-evoked potential (MEP) from the spinal cord correlated well with the postoperative motor deficit. CMAP is a sensitive tool for the early detection of spinal cord impairment caused by ischemic or compressive insults to the spinal cord. The time after the disappearance of the CMAP amplitude was important for predicting postoperative motor deficit, but it is also necessary to employ CMAP concomitantly with other conductive potentials in spinal cord monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11819141     DOI: 10.1007/s776-002-8430-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sci        ISSN: 0949-2658            Impact factor:   1.601


  6 in total

1.  History of the development of intraoperative spinal cord monitoring.

Authors:  Tetsuya Tamaki; Seiji Kubota
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Transcranial motor evoked potentials electrically elicited by multi-train stimulation can reflect isolated nerve root injury more precisely than those by conventional multi-pulse stimulation: an experimental study in rats.

Authors:  Takuhei Kozaki; Shunji Tsutsui; Hiroshi Yamada
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Indirect posterior decompression with corrective fusion for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the thoracic spine: is it possible to predict the surgical results?

Authors:  Yukihiro Matsuyama; Yoshihito Sakai; Yoshito Katayama; Shiro Imagama; Zenya Ito; Norimitsu Wakao; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Keigo Ito; Mitsuhiro Kamiya; Tokumi Kanemura; Koji Sato; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Monophasic transcranial constant-current versus constant-voltage stimulation of motor-evoked potentials during spinal surgery.

Authors:  Keisuke Masuda; Hideki Shigematsu; Masato Tanaka; Eiichiro Iwata; Yusuke Yamamoto; Masahiko Kawaguchi; Tsunenori Takatani; Sachiko Kawasaki; Yasuhito Tanaka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Intraoperative Spinal Cord Monitoring: Focusing on the Basic Knowledge of Orthopedic Spine Surgeon and Neurosurgeon as Members of a Team Performing Spine Surgery under Neuromonitoring.

Authors:  Tetsuya Tamaki; Muneharu Ando; Yukihiro Nakagawa; Hiroshi Iwasaki; Shunji Tsutsui; Masanari Takami; Hiroshi Yamada
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-03-10

Review 6.  Basic Principles and Recent Trends of Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials in Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring.

Authors:  Shunji Tsutsui; Hiroshi Yamada
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 1.742

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.