Literature DB >> 3057403

Corneal re-graft: indications and outcome.

C J MacEwen1, Z U Khan, E Anderson, C G MacEwen.   

Abstract

The results of 62 repeat penetrating keratoplasties (41 eyes) over a 10-year period are presented. The common indications for the primary graft include herpes simplex keratitis, pseudophakic bullous keratopathy, aphakic bullous keratopathy, Fuch's endothelial dystrophy, and chronic ulceration. All cases of pseudophakic bullous keratopathy had the iris-clip type of intraocular lens. Graft failure was attributed to rejection, endothelial failure, recurrent ulceration, herpes simplex keratitis, melting, trauma, and recurrent dystrophy. At the end of the study period 28 grafts (68%) were clear and 13 (32%) were opaque. Visual improvement occurred in 28 eyes (68%), deterioration in four (10%), and six (15%) remained unchanged (visual result was not available in three eyes). These data are encouraging in terms of visual outcome and graft clarity in cases of repeat penetrating keratoplasty. Comparison is made between the primary indications and outcome of these re-grafts and eyes requiring only one graft. Initial indications for grafting in both groups were similar, other than keratoconus, which was a significantly more common indication in eyes that required only one graft. Final visual results were better in those eyes undergoing only one graft, compared with those that required multiple surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3057403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg        ISSN: 0022-023X


  5 in total

1.  Penetrating keratoplasty: indications over a 10 year period.

Authors:  N Al-Yousuf; I Mavrikakis; E Mavrikakis; S M Daya
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Comparison of outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty versus Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for penetrating keratoplasty graft failure due to corneal edema.

Authors:  Anna S Kitzmann; George R Wandling; John E Sutphin; Kenneth M Goins; Michael D Wagoner
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01-22       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Repeat penetrating keratoplasty: indications, graft survival, and visual outcome.

Authors:  H Al-Mezaine; M D Wagoner
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Visual outcome in corneal grafts: a preliminary analysis of the Swedish Corneal Transplant Register.

Authors:  M Claesson; W J Armitage; P Fagerholm; U Stenevi
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Indications and outcome of repeat penetrating keratoplasty in India.

Authors:  M Vanathi; Namrata Sharma; Rajesh Sinha; Radhika Tandon; Jeewan S Titiyal; Rasik B Vajpayee
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 2.209

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.