Literature DB >> 11814134

Robots in laparoscopic surgery.

S Horgan1, D Vanuno.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Da Vinci Robotic System became available at our institution in late August 2000. We decided to utilize this system to perform advanced laparoscopic procedures.
METHODS: This is a review of the status of robotics and its application in surgery. We report our experience using the Da Vinci system.
RESULTS: We have used the Da Vinci for 34 advanced laparoscopic cases: 7 gastric bypasses for morbid obesity, 9 Heller myotomies for achalasia, 11 donor nephrectomies, 2 gastrojejunostomies, and single cases of bilateral adrenalectomy, Nissen fundoplication, Toupet fundoplication, and cholecystectomy. No robot-related complications were noted.
CONCLUSIONS: This early experience suggests that robotic surgery is a safe and effective alternative to conventional laparoscopic surgery. We believe that robotic surgery, with its ability to restore the hand-eye coordination and three-dimensional view lost in laparoscopic surgery, will allow us to perform complex procedures with greater precision and confidence and better results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11814134     DOI: 10.1089/10926420152761950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  71 in total

1.  Early results of one-year robotic surgery using the Da Vinci system to perform advanced laparoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Ahmet Ayav; Laurent Bresler; Laurent Brunaud; Patrick Boissel
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Robotic surgery update.

Authors:  G Jacobsen; F Elli; S Horgan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  The emerging role of robotics in adrenal surgery.

Authors:  James S Rosoff; Brandon J Otto; Joseph J Del Pizzo
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Robot assisted adrenalectomy: a handy tool or glorified obsession?

Authors:  Mrinal Pahwa
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-08

5.  Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, is it Safer than Laparoscopic Bypass?

Authors:  Rena C Moon; Juan C Gutierrez; Nelson A Royall; Andre F Teixeira; Muhammad A Jawad
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 6.  Laparoscopic and robotic adrenal surgery: transperitoneal approach.

Authors:  Alexis K Okoh; Eren Berber
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-10

7.  The Results of 100 Robotic Versus 100 Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Procedures: a Single High Volume Centre Experience.

Authors:  R M Smeenk; G van 't Hof; E Elsten; P G B M Feskens
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a retrospective, single-center study of early perioperative outcomes at a community hospital.

Authors:  Arif Ahmad; Jared D Carleton; Zoha F Ahmad; Ashish Agarwala
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic digestive surgery: Present and future directions.

Authors:  Juan C Rodríguez-Sanjuán; Marcos Gómez-Ruiz; Soledad Trugeda-Carrera; Carlos Manuel-Palazuelos; Antonio López-Useros; Manuel Gómez-Fleitas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Robotic-assisted pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Authors:  A Ayav; L Bresler; J Hubert; L Brunaud; P Boissel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.