Literature DB >> 11812474

Tibial intramedullary nail distal interlocking screw placement: comparison of the free-hand versus distally-based targeting device techniques.

Z Gugala1, A Nana, R W Lindsey.   

Abstract

Intramedullary nailing is the standard treatment for closed and some open unstable diaphyseal tibia fractures. Fluoroscopy, while essential for proper nail placement can subject the surgical team and patient to substantial radiation. A new targeting system for tibia nail distal interlocking was developed by Orthofix to limit fluoroscopy. This prospective clinical study compares the Orthofix targeting system versus a free-hand technique for the tibial nail distal interlocking. Fifty eight consecutive patients with sixty tibial fractures amenable for nail fixation were randomly assigned into two equal groups: Group 1: Orthofix distally based distal targeting device and Group 2: a free-hand technique. In all the cases stabilization was achieved with a reamed statically locked tibial nail. Recorded data included accuracy of screw placement, duration of surgery prior to and during distal interlocking, and the fluoroscopy time prior to and during distal interlocking. Both groups revealed comparable fracture patterns. In all fractures the technical aspects of the surgical treatment were performed without complications. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the mean time of surgery prior to (62.02 vs. 61.01 min, P=0.92) and during distal interlocking (17.06 vs. 19.08 min, P=0.55), or in the total surgical time (81 vs. 85 min), respectively. Neither was there a statistically significant difference in the mean fluoroscopy time prior to distal interlocking (69 vs. 81 s, p=0.22) nor in the total fluoroscopy time (84 vs. 117 s). There was however, a statistically significant difference between the Orthofix and free-hand groups with regards to the mean fluoroscopy time during distal interlocking (15 vs. 36 s, P=0.01, respectively). This study demonstrates that the distally based distal targeting device by Orthofix for tibial nailing can significantly decrease the mean fluoroscopy time necessary to complete distal interlocking versus free-hand technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11812474     DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(01)00115-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  18 in total

1.  [Clinical results with A new retrograde femoral nail with a radiographical-free proximal locking device. A prospective study with 50 fractures].

Authors:  B Friemert; P Keppler; F von Lübken; C Willy; L Claes; H Gerngross; D Wörz
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Distal locking of tibial nails : a new device to reduce radiation exposure.

Authors:  George Anastopoulos; Panagiotis G Ntagiopoulos; Dionisios Chissas; Athanasios Papaeliou; Antonios Asimakopoulos
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Does the magnetic-guided intramedullary nailing technique shorten operation time and radiation exposure?

Authors:  Muhsin Dursun; Tughan Kalkan; Mahmut Nedim Aytekin; Ismail Celik; Mahmut Uğurlu
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-07-03

4.  Is distal locking of long nails for intertrochanteric fractures necessary? A clinical study.

Authors:  Bryan G Vopat; Patrick M Kane; Jeremy Truntzer; Philip McClure; David Paller; Emily Abbood; Christopher Born
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2014-07-28

5.  A tip to reduce the malrotation of the spiral tibial fracture intraoperatively.

Authors:  Jialiang Guo; Yingze Zhang; Zhiyong Hou; Zengyan Li
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-01-11

6.  Fluoroscopic freehand and electromagnetic-guided targeting system for distal locking screws of humeral intramedullary nail.

Authors:  P Persiani; M Gurzi; O Moreschini; G Di Giacomo; C Villani
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-11-22

7.  Achieving interlocking nails without using an image intensifier.

Authors:  Innocent C Ikem; Johnson D Ogunlusi; Henry R Ine
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Are inflatable nails an alternative to interlocked nails in tibial fractures?

Authors:  Jesper Blomquist; Odd J Lundberg; Nils R Gjerdet; Anders Mølster
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Intramedullary tibial nailing in distal third tibial fractures: distal locking screws and fracture non-union.

Authors:  Aso Mohammed; Ramaswamy Saravanan; Jason Zammit; Richard King
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Radiation-free Insertion of Distal Interlocking Screw in Tibial and Femur Nailing: A Simple Technique.

Authors:  Ritesh Kumar Soni; Surender Mohan Mehta; Bhanu Awasthi; Janith Lal Singh; Amit Kumar; Lokesh Thakur; Sujit Kumar Tripathy
Journal:  J Surg Tech Case Rep       Date:  2012-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.