Literature DB >> 23994044

The use of contact heat evoked potential stimulator (CHEPS) in magnetoencephalography for pain research.

Raghavan Gopalakrishnan1, Andre G Machado, Richard C Burgess, John C Mosher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Contact heat evoked potentials (CHEP) is a thermal stimulus modality used in pain research. We examine a commercial CHEP stimulator (CHEPS) that is designed to work in an fMRI environment, but poorly understood in the MEG environment. The CHEPS attains target temperatures rapidly using sophisticated control signals that unfortunately induce artifacts in the MEG. In this paper, we summarize our experiences using the CHEPS in MEG to study pain using an experimental paradigm, and propose a novel method for managing its artifact. NEW
METHOD: We introduce a novel damped sinusoid modeling (DSM) technique to remove the CHEPS artifact based on estimates of the underlying sinusoids and damping factors. We show comparisons to signal space projection (SSP) and temporal signal space separation (tSSS) methods.
RESULTS: The CHEPS artifact is highly dynamic, yet deterministic, switching rapidly from one frequency to another, with different spatial components. The galvanic connection between the subject and the CHEPS probe alters its performance, making pre-characterization difficult. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING
METHODS: SSP methods failed to remove the artifact completely. TSSS performed better than SSP; however, tSSS requires the use of a multipolar head model that decreases the dimensionality and possibly the information content of the data. In contrast, DSM offers a strictly temporal modeling approach in which the artifact is estimated as a sum of damped sinusoids which is subtracted from the data.
CONCLUSION: Though the CHEPS increases the noise floor and introduces artifacts to the data, we believe the device can be successfully used in MEG if appropriate artifact removal techniques are followed.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artifact rejection; CHEP(S); Contact heat evoked potentials; DBS; DSM; Damped sinusoids; FDA; FID; Food and Drug Administration; MEG; MSR; Magnetoencephalography; RMS; SAM; SNR; SSP; SVD; TLS; contact heat evoked potentials (stimulator); damped sinusoid model; deep brain stimulation; fMRI; free induction decay; functional magnetic resonance imaging; magnetically shielded room; magnetoencephalography; root mean square; signal space projection; signal to noise ratio; singular value decomposition; synthetic aperture magnetometry; tSSS; temporal signal space separation; total least squares

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23994044      PMCID: PMC3881311          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.08.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  23 in total

1.  Anticipatory brainstem activity predicts neural processing of pain in humans.

Authors:  Merle Fairhurst; Katja Wiech; Paul Dunckley; Irene Tracey
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  Attention to painful stimulation enhances gamma-band activity and synchronization in human sensorimotor cortex.

Authors:  Michael Hauck; Jürgen Lorenz; Andreas K Engel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Removal of magnetoencephalographic artifacts with temporal signal-space separation: demonstration with single-trial auditory-evoked responses.

Authors:  Samu Taulu; Riitta Hari
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Determinants of laser-evoked EEG responses: pain perception or stimulus saliency?

Authors:  G D Iannetti; N P Hughes; M C Lee; A Mouraux
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Effective electromagnetic noise cancellation with beamformers and synthetic gradiometry in shielded and partly shielded environments.

Authors:  P Adjamian; S F Worthen; A Hillebrand; P L Furlong; B A Chizh; A R Hobson; Q Aziz; G R Barnes
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Pain-related somatosensory evoked magnetic fields induced by controlled ballistic mechanical impacts.

Authors:  K Druschky; E Lang; C Hummel; M Kaltenhäuser; L U Kohllöffel; B Neundörfer; H Stefan
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.177

Review 7.  Cortical representation of pain: functional characterization of nociceptive areas near the lateral sulcus.

Authors:  Rolf-Detlef Treede; Vania A Apkarian; Burkhart Bromm; Joel D Greenspan; Frederick A Lenz
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Cortical alpha rhythms are related to the anticipation of sensorimotor interaction between painful stimuli and movements: a high-resolution EEG study.

Authors:  Claudio Babiloni; Paolo Capotosto; Alfredo Brancucci; Claudio Del Percio; Laura Petrini; Maura Buttiglione; Giuseppe Cibelli; Gian Luca Romani; Paolo Maria Rossini; Lars Arendt-Nielsen
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 9.  Imaging pain.

Authors:  I Tracey
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research.

Authors:  Joachim Gross; Sylvain Baillet; Gareth R Barnes; Richard N Henson; Arjan Hillebrand; Ole Jensen; Karim Jerbi; Vladimir Litvak; Burkhard Maess; Robert Oostenveld; Lauri Parkkonen; Jason R Taylor; Virginie van Wassenhove; Michael Wibral; Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  5 in total

1.  Coding Prony's method in MATLAB and applying it to biomedical signal filtering.

Authors:  A Fernández Rodríguez; L de Santiago Rodrigo; E López Guillén; J M Rodríguez Ascariz; J M Miguel Jiménez; Luciano Boquete
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  A magnetoencephalography study of visual processing of pain anticipation.

Authors:  Andre G Machado; Raghavan Gopalakrishnan; Ela B Plow; Richard C Burgess; John C Mosher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  IFCN-endorsed practical guidelines for clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG).

Authors:  Riitta Hari; Sylvain Baillet; Gareth Barnes; Richard Burgess; Nina Forss; Joachim Gross; Matti Hämäläinen; Ole Jensen; Ryusuke Kakigi; François Mauguière; Nobukatzu Nakasato; Aina Puce; Gian-Luca Romani; Alfons Schnitzler; Samu Taulu
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Early event related fields during visually evoked pain anticipation.

Authors:  Raghavan Gopalakrishnan; Richard C Burgess; Ela B Plow; Darlene P Floden; Andre G Machado
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-05       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  A magnetoencephalography study of multi-modal processing of pain anticipation in primary sensory cortices.

Authors:  R Gopalakrishnan; R C Burgess; E B Plow; D P Floden; A G Machado
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 3.590

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.