Literature DB >> 11810154

Noncontrast MR imaging and MR arthrography of the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow: prospective evaluation of two-dimensional pulse sequences for detection of complete tears.

J A Carrino1, W B Morrison, K H Zou, R T Steffen, W N Snearly, P M Murray.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare MR imaging techniques with differing contrast and spatial resolution for evaluation of complete disruption of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) anterior bundle in a cadaveric elbow model.
DESIGN: Complete UCL tears were surgically created at the typical location for clinical tears in eight of 28 fresh frozen cadaveric elbow specimens. All specimens underwent 1.5 T MR imaging in the oblique coronal plane, using an extremity coil. The sequences employed were: T1-weighted spin echo (T1 SE), proton density-weighted (PD) fast spin echo (FSE), fat-suppressed T2-weighted FSE (T2 FSE), gradient recalled echo (GRE) with a high matrix, PD FSE with a high matrix (HRPD), and fat suppressed T1-weighted SE with intra-articular gadolinium (MRAr). Two radiologists independently graded the UCL with separate and side-by-side assessments.
RESULTS: Sensitivity/specificity pairs were as follows for reader A and reader B, respectively: T1 SE: 0.25/0.95, 0.50/0.95; PD FSE: 0.38/1.00, 0.25/1.00; T2 FSE: 0.50/0.95, 0.63/0.95; GRE: 0.63/0.85, 0.63/0.60; MRAr: 0.88/1.00, 1.00/0.80; HRPD: 0.50/1.00, 0.88/0.80. Kappa statistics for measuring interobserver reliability for each sequence were poor under T1 SE (-0.13) and GRE (0.19), moderate under HRPD (0.41) and T2 FSE (0.44) and good under MRAr (0.62) and PD FSE (0.78). For both readers, the rating for overall image quality was highest for HRPD, and the rating for UCL lesion conspicuity was the highest for MRAr.
CONCLUSIONS: Of the MR imaging pulse sequences tested, MRAr showed the greatest ability to identify complete ligamentous injuries with good agreement between readers and had the highest subjective preference for lesion conspicuity. However, HRPD had the least interobserver variability and the highest subjective preference for overall image quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11810154     DOI: 10.1007/s002560100396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  15 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the elbow. Part II: Abnormalities of the ligaments, tendons, and nerves.

Authors:  Richard Kijowski; Michael Tuite; Matthew Sanford
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2004-10-05       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Statistical combination schemes of repeated diagnostic test data.

Authors:  Kelly H Zou; Jui G Bhagwat; John A Carrino
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 3.  Routine 3D magnetic resonance imaging of joints.

Authors:  Richard Kijowski; Garry E Gold
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance imaging of elbow injuries in children.

Authors:  Nancy A Chauvin; Cristy N Gustas-French
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-11-04

Review 5.  Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries in Contact Athletes.

Authors:  Ravi Vaswani; Alex White; Joshua Dines
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2022-08-02

6.  The posterior transtriceps approach for elbow arthrography: a forgotten technique?

Authors:  M Lohman; C Borrero; B Casagranda; B Rafiee; J Towers
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Traumatic instability of the elbow - anatomy, pathomechanisms and presentation on imaging.

Authors:  Christoph Schaeffeler; Simone Waldt; Klaus Woertler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  High-resolution MR imaging of the elbow using a microscopy surface coil and a clinical 1.5 T MR machine: preliminary results.

Authors:  Hiroshi Yoshioka; Teruko Ueno; Toshikazu Tanaka; Yuka Kujiraoka; Masashi Shindo; Nobuyuki Takahashi; Yasumasa Nishiura; Naoyuki Ochiai; Yukihisa Saida
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2004-03-26       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Ultrasound assessment of the lateral collateral ligamentous complex of the elbow: imaging aspects in cadavers and normal volunteers.

Authors:  Pedro Augusto Gondim Teixeira; Patrick Omoumi; Debra J Trudell; Samuel R Ward; Sophie Lecocq; Alain Blum; Donald L Resnick
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-02-13       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction: Anatomy, Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Brandon J Erickson; Joshua D Harris; Peter N Chalmers; Bernard R Bach; Nikhil N Verma; Charles A Bush-Joseph; Anthony A Romeo
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.843

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.