Ravi Vaswani1, Alex White2, Joshua Dines2. 1. Sports Medicine Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA. ravi90@gmail.com. 2. Sports Medicine Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this article is to review medial ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries in contact athletes. UCL injuries in overhead throwing athletes are typically chronic attenuation due to repetitive valgus stress on the elbow during the throwing motion. As such, UCL reconstruction is commonly performed for these athletes. In contrast, UCL injuries in contact athletes are usually acute ligament tears or avulsions of a ligament with otherwise normal tissue. Nonoperative treatment is typically the first-line treatment for partial injuries. UCL repair may work well for acute complete injuries and may avoid the donor site morbidity of UCL reconstruction. RECENT FINDINGS: Most of the literature regarding UCL injuries have been performed in baseball players. Historically, UCL repair has had poor outcomes in baseball players due to the chronic ligament attenuation. Therefore, much of the recent literature has focused on outcomes of UCL reconstruction, which are generally excellent. However, there is a paucity of literature studying outcomes of UCL injuries in contact athletes and those studying UCL repair. One recent study looked at a new technique for UCL repair with collagen-coated fiber tape augmentation in baseball players and found good short-term outcomes. UCL injuries in contact athletes occur typically as acute tears or avulsions. While UCL reconstruction has typically been recommended as the accepted treatment for UCL tears that require operative treatment, UCL repair may be a good alternative in contact athletes.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this article is to review medial ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries in contact athletes. UCL injuries in overhead throwing athletes are typically chronic attenuation due to repetitive valgus stress on the elbow during the throwing motion. As such, UCL reconstruction is commonly performed for these athletes. In contrast, UCL injuries in contact athletes are usually acute ligament tears or avulsions of a ligament with otherwise normal tissue. Nonoperative treatment is typically the first-line treatment for partial injuries. UCL repair may work well for acute complete injuries and may avoid the donor site morbidity of UCL reconstruction. RECENT FINDINGS: Most of the literature regarding UCL injuries have been performed in baseball players. Historically, UCL repair has had poor outcomes in baseball players due to the chronic ligament attenuation. Therefore, much of the recent literature has focused on outcomes of UCL reconstruction, which are generally excellent. However, there is a paucity of literature studying outcomes of UCL injuries in contact athletes and those studying UCL repair. One recent study looked at a new technique for UCL repair with collagen-coated fiber tape augmentation in baseball players and found good short-term outcomes. UCL injuries in contact athletes occur typically as acute tears or avulsions. While UCL reconstruction has typically been recommended as the accepted treatment for UCL tears that require operative treatment, UCL repair may be a good alternative in contact athletes.
Authors: Justin M Dubin; Jorge L Rojas; Amrut U Borade; Filippo Familiari; Edward G McFarland Journal: Phys Sportsmed Date: 2019-03-11 Impact factor: 2.241
Authors: Brandon J Erickson; Joshua D Harris; Peter N Chalmers; Bernard R Bach; Nikhil N Verma; Charles A Bush-Joseph; Anthony A Romeo Journal: Sports Health Date: 2015-09-22 Impact factor: 3.843