Literature DB >> 11809701

Alterations of Smad signaling in human breast carcinoma are associated with poor outcome: a tissue microarray study.

Wen Xie1, Joachim C Mertens, Daniel J Reiss, David L Rimm, Robert L Camp, Bruce G Haffty, Michael Reiss.   

Abstract

Based largely on studies of cell lines in vitro and of transgenic mouse models, disruptions of transforming growth factor (TGF) beta signaling are thought to contribute to the development and progression of human breast cancer. However, whether and how TGF-beta signaling becomes disrupted during human breast cancer development in vivo remains largely unknown. To address this question, we have compared the patterns of expression and activation of the postreceptor components of the TGF-beta signaling pathway, the so-called Smads, in human breast cancer cell lines with those in breast carcinoma specimens. None of the breast carcinoma cell lines were growth arrested by TGF-beta in vitro. Each of the tumor cell lines expressed normal levels of Smad2 and -3. Moreover, TGF-beta treatment induced phosphorylation of Smad2 (Smad2P) in each of these lines, except those that lacked TGF-beta type II receptors. Moreover, only one of the cell lines failed to express Smad4. Among 456 cases of human breast carcinoma assembled in tissue microarrays, the majority (92%) expressed Smad2, Smad2P, as well as Smad4, indicating their ability to proliferate within a microenvironment that contains bioactive TGF-beta. Thirty cases (6.6%) failed to express Smad2P, suggesting the loss of TGF-beta receptor signaling. Nine cases (2%) failed to express Smad4, and 3 of these also failed to express Smad2P. Thus, the phenotypes of breast tumors in vivo paralleled that of human breast cancer cell lines in terms of Smad2P and Smad4 expression. Loss of Smad signaling was not associated with any particular histological subtype, histological or nuclear grade, estrogen- or progesterone receptor expression, or HER2/neu expression. Loss of Smad4 was inversely correlated with the presence of axillary lymph node metastases. Most importantly, among patients with stage II breast cancer, lack of Smad2P expression in the tumor was strongly associated with shorter overall survival. Finally, analysis of a small cohort of hereditary breast cancers failed to reveal any association between BRCA1 or BRCA2 genotype and alterations in Smad signaling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11809701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  59 in total

Review 1.  Lung cancer . 3: Fluorescence bronchoscopy: clinical dilemmas and research opportunities.

Authors:  A K Banerjee; P H Rabbitts; J George
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 2.  TGF-beta and immune cells: an important regulatory axis in the tumor microenvironment and progression.

Authors:  Li Yang; Yanli Pang; Harold L Moses
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 16.687

Review 3.  Phosphorylation state-specific antibodies: applications in investigative and diagnostic pathology.

Authors:  James W Mandell
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  ChEA: transcription factor regulation inferred from integrating genome-wide ChIP-X experiments.

Authors:  Alexander Lachmann; Huilei Xu; Jayanth Krishnan; Seth I Berger; Amin R Mazloom; Avi Ma'ayan
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Tumor suppressor function of RUNX3 in breast cancer.

Authors:  Lin-Feng Chen
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.429

6.  SND1 acts as a novel gene transcription activator recognizing the conserved Motif domains of Smad promoters, inducing TGFβ1 response and breast cancer metastasis.

Authors:  L Yu; Y Di; L Xin; Y Ren; X Liu; X Sun; W Zhang; Z Yao; J Yang
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  Q RT-PCR detection of chromogranin A: a new standard in the identification of neuroendocrine tumor disease.

Authors:  Mark Kidd; Irvin M Modlin; Shrikant M Mane; Robert L Camp; Michael D Shapiro
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Chronic TGF-β exposure drives stabilized EMT, tumor stemness, and cancer drug resistance with vulnerability to bitopic mTOR inhibition.

Authors:  Yoko Katsuno; Dominique Stephan Meyer; Ziyang Zhang; Kevan M Shokat; Rosemary J Akhurst; Kohei Miyazono; Rik Derynck
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 8.192

9.  The predictive value of genes of the TGF-beta1 pathway in multimodally treated squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  Franziska Pühringer-Oppermann; Mario Sarbia; Nicola Ott; Björn L D M Brücher
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  TGFbeta in Cancer.

Authors:  Joan Massagué
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 41.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.