Literature DB >> 11799293

Has the incidence of perforated peptic ulcer decreased over the last decade?

F Sánchez-Bueno1, P Marín, A Ríos, J L Aguayo, R Robles, A Piñero, J A Fernández, P Parrilla.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic use of new drugs for inhibiting gastric secretion together with Helicobacter pylori antimicrobe therapy has given rise to controversy over the current incidence of perforated peptic ulcer (gastroduodenal peptic ulcer, GDPU). The aim of this study is to analyze the incidence of ulcer perforation over the last 12 years in our health area and the influence of new medical treatments.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our series includes 246 patients operated on for perforated peptic ulcer during a 12-year period (January 1987 to December 1998) in our health area. The mean patient age was 55.2 +/- 18.1 (16-93) years, and there was a predominance of males (199/246; 80.9%). The ulcer was located fundamentally in the pylorus (48.3%) and duodenal bulb (39.1%), and the most frequent surgical technique was bilateral truncal vagotomy associated with pyloroplasty (85.3%).
RESULTS: During the 1987-1992 period, 152 patients underwent surgery, whereas 94 patients were operated on between 1993 and 1998, which reveals a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). Furthermore, if we divide the study into four 3-year periods (1987-1989, 1990-1992, 1993-1995 and 1996-1998), we see that there were 74 and 78 GDPUs in the first two periods, with no statistical differences between each other, and 48 and 46 cases in the last two periods, also with no statistical differences between each other, but statistically significant when compared to the first two periods.
CONCLUSION: The incidence of perforated GDPU has dropped by half over the last 6 years due fundamentally to the use of proton pump inhibitors. Copyright 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11799293     DOI: 10.1159/000050191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Surg        ISSN: 0253-4886            Impact factor:   2.588


  6 in total

1.  Clinicopathological characteristics and survival difference between gastric stump carcinoma and primary upper third gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masanori Tokunaga; Takeshi Sano; Shigekazu Ohyama; Naoki Hiki; Tetsu Fukunaga; Kazuhiko Yamada; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Gastric tube perforation after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Hideyuki Ubukata; Takeshi Nakachi; Takanobu Tabuchi; Hiroyuki Nagata; Akira Takemura; Jiro Shimazaki; Satoru Konishi; Takafumi Tabuchi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 3.  Gastroenterostoma after Billroth antrectomy as a premalignant condition.

Authors:  Robert Sitarz; Ryszard Maciejewski; Wojciech P Polkowski; G Johan A Offerhaus
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Ten-Year Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic Repair versus Open Closure of Perforated.

Authors:  Vishwanath Golash
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2008-10

5.  Laparoscopic repair of perforated gastroduodenal ulcer by running suture.

Authors:  Jörg Köninger; Peter Böttinger; Jens Redecke; Michael Butters
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Changes in the localization of perforated peptic ulcer and its relation to gender and age of the patients throughout the last 45 years.

Authors:  Andrzej Wysocki; Piotr Budzyński; Jan Kulawik; Włodzimierz Drożdż
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.352

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.