Literature DB >> 22334835

Ten-Year Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic Repair versus Open Closure of Perforated.

Vishwanath Golash1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aim of this study was to compare the result of open and laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers in terms of operation time, postoperative pain, hospital stay, and wound infection.
METHODS: Clinical notes of 152 patients who underwent the operative closure of perforated peptic ulcers from 1996 to 2006 were available for study. All patients were offered laparoscopic approach from 1998 onward. Repair was done using omentum patch. Open approach was used in 57 patients and laparoscopic in 95 patients. Results were analyzed in terms of requirement of analgesia, hospital stay, return to work, complications, and mortality.
RESULTS: Closure was successful in all cases using omentum patch. There was no conversion to open in laparoscopic group. The mean operation time was less in laparoscopic versus open (P<0.001). The mean number of analgesic injection given were 3 and the hospital stay was 4 days in laparoscopy, the corresponding figure in laparotomy were 6 and 9 respectively (P<0.001). Total numbers of complication in laparoscopic repair were 9 compared to 35 in open (P=0.011). Two patients died in each group. Incidental significant incidences of perforations was observed in men (P<0.001), fasting during Ramadan (P<0.001), smokers (P<0.001), past history of peptic ulcer disease (P=0.007), and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (P=0.035).
CONCLUSION: Compared to open approach, laparoscopic repair required shorter operation time, lesser analgesia, had fewer complications, shorter hospital stays and early return to work.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Helicobacter Pylori; Laparoscopy; Omentum Patch; Perforated Peptic Ulcer; Ramadan

Year:  2008        PMID: 22334835      PMCID: PMC3273918     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oman Med J        ISSN: 1999-768X


  17 in total

Review 1.  Trends in perforated peptic ulcer: incidence, etiology, treatment, and prognosis.

Authors:  C Svanes
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Laparoscopic and open approach in perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Hiroaki Tsumura; Toru Ichikawa; Eiso Hiyama; Yoshiaki Murakami
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct

Review 3.  Systematic review comparing laparoscopic and open repair for perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  R Lunevicius; M Morkevicius
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Early laparoscopy as a routine procedure in the management of acute abdominal pain: a review of 1,320 patients.

Authors:  V Golash; P D Willson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Role of Helicobacter pylori infection and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in peptic-ulcer disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jia Qing Huang; Subbaramiah Sridhar; Richard H Hunt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-01-05       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Wing T Siu; Heng T Leong; Bonita K B Law; Chun H Chau; Anthony C N Li; Kai H Fung; Yuk P Tai; Michael K W Li
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease.

Authors:  A E Sanabria; C H Morales; M I Villegas
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-10-19

8.  Outcome of peptic ulcer bleeding, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, and Helicobacter pylori infection.

Authors:  Dewkoemar Ramsoekh; Monique E van Leerdam; Erik A J Rauws; Guido N J Tytgat
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Laparoscopic versus open surgical closure of perforated duodenal ulcers: a comparative study.

Authors:  Vinay G Mehendale; Sharad N Shenoy; Atul M Joshi; Namita C Chaudhari
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec

10.  Emergency laparoscopy--current best practice.

Authors:  Oliver Warren; James Kinross; Paraskevas Paraskeva; Ara Darzi
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  4 in total

1.  Laparoscopic Peptic Ulcer Perforation Closure: the Preferred Choice.

Authors:  Franal H Shah; Sudhir G Mehta; Mona D Gandhi
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 0.656

2.  Surgical repair of perforated peptic ulcers: laparoscopic versus open approach.

Authors:  Victor Vakayil; Brent Bauman; Keaton Joppru; Reema Mallick; Christopher Tignanelli; John Connett; Sayeed Ikramuddin; James V Harmon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  An Updated Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcer.

Authors:  Chunhua Zhou; Weizhi Wang; Jiwei Wang; Xiaoyu Zhang; Qun Zhang; Bowen Li; Zekuan Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Laparoscopic versus Open Omental Patch Repair for Early Presentation of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Matched Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Daniel Jin Keat Lee; MaDong Ye; Keith Haozhe Sun; Vishalkumar G Shelat; Aaryan Koura
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2016-09-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.