Literature DB >> 11798439

Recognition memory and decision processes: a meta-analysis of remember, know, and guess responses.

John M Gardiner1, Cristina Ramponi, Alan Richardson-Klavehn.   

Abstract

A meta-analysis of proportions of remember, know, and guess responses was carried out on observations from 86 experimental conditions in 23 different recognition memory experiments. Unlike remember and know responses, guess responses revealed no memory for the test items that elicited them. A signal detection analysis of these data showed that A' estimates of the strength of the memory trace depended on response criteria. A' estimates increased significantly when know responses were added to remember responses, and decreased significantly when guess responses were added to remember and know responses. It was guessing, rather than knowing, that was most strongly correlated with overall response criteria. Nor were remembering and knowing correlated significantly. These results do not support a quantitative trace strength model according to which these responses merely reflect different response criteria. They support theories that ascribe remembering and knowing to qualitatively distinct memory systems or processes.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11798439     DOI: 10.1080/09658210143000281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  36 in total

1.  Transferring voice effects in recognition memory from remembering to knowing.

Authors:  Irene Karayianni; John M Gardiner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-10

Review 2.  Anterograde episodic memory in Korsakoff syndrome.

Authors:  Rosemary Fama; Anne-Lise Pitel; Edith V Sullivan
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 7.444

3.  Recognition and context memory for faces from own and other ethnic groups: a remember-know investigation.

Authors:  Ruth Horry; Daniel B Wright; Colin G Tredoux
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-03

4.  In defense of the signal detection interpretation of remember/know judgments.

Authors:  John T Wixted; Vincent Stretch
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-08

5.  Recognition memory and introspective remember/know judgments: evidence for the influence of distractor plausibility on "remembering" and a caution about purportedly nonparametric measures.

Authors:  Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-03

6.  Recognition memory and awareness: occurrence of perceptual effects in remembering or in knowing depends on conscious resources at encoding, but not at retrieval.

Authors:  John M Gardiner; Vernon H Gregg; Irene Karayianni
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

7.  "I remember/know/guess that I knew it all along!": subjective experience versus objective measures of the knew-it-all-along effect.

Authors:  Michelle M Arnold; D Stephen Lindsay
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-12

8.  The effects of divided attention at study and test on false recognition: a comparison of DRM and categorized lists.

Authors:  Lauren M Knott; Stephen A Dewhurst
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-12

9.  Automatic processing influences free recall: converging evidence from the process dissociation procedure and remember-know judgments.

Authors:  David P McCabe; Henry L Roediger; Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-04

10.  The tracks of my years: Personal significance contributes to the reminiscence bump.

Authors:  Clare J Rathbone; Akira R O'Connor; Chris J A Moulin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.