Literature DB >> 14704020

Transferring voice effects in recognition memory from remembering to knowing.

Irene Karayianni1, John M Gardiner.   

Abstract

In five experiments, we investigated the effects of voice congruency (same vs. different voices at study and at test) on remembering and knowing in recognition memory. With low- and medium-frequency three- or four-syllable words, a voice congruency effect occurred only in remembering. With nonwords, voice congruency effects occurred both in remembering and in knowing. With nonwords and divided attention at study, the voice congruency effect transferred almost completely from remembering to knowing. By showing a transfer of effects from remembering to knowing as encoding became more impoverished, these findings support a distinctiveness/fluency account of remembering and knowing as well as the theory that remembering and knowing indicate retrieval of events from episodic and semantic memory systems, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14704020     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  32 in total

1.  Effects of hearing words, imaging hearing words, and reading on auditory implicit and explicit memory tests.

Authors:  M Pilotti; D A Gallo; H L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-12

2.  Impact of encoding depth on awareness of perceptual effects in recognition memory.

Authors:  J M Gardiner; V H Gregg; R Mashru; M Thaman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-04

3.  Auditory priming: implicit and explicit memory for words and voices.

Authors:  D L Schacter; B A Church
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Sum-difference theory of remembering and knowing: a two-dimensional signal-detection model.

Authors:  Caren M Rotello; Neil A Macmillan; John A Reeder
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Repetition of previously novel melodies sometimes increases both remember and know responses in recognition memory.

Authors:  J M Gardiner; Z Kaminska; M Dixon; R I Java
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-09

6.  Maintenance rehearsal affects knowing, not remembering; elaborative rehearsal affects remembering, not knowing.

Authors:  J M Gardiner; B Gawlik; A Richardson-Klavehn
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-03

7.  Changes in memory awareness during learning: the acquisition of knowledge by psychology undergraduates.

Authors:  M A Conway; J M Gardiner; T J Perfect; S J Anderson; G M Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1997-12

8.  Experiences of remembering, knowing, and guessing.

Authors:  J M Gardiner; C Ramponi; A Richardson-Klavehn
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  1998-03

Review 9.  Episodic memory and autonoetic consciousness: a first-person approach.

Authors:  J M Gardiner
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2001-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Distinguishing states of awareness from confidence during retrieval: evidence from amnesia.

Authors:  Suparna Rajaram; Maryellen Hamilton; Anthony Bolton
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.282

View more
  2 in total

1.  In defense of the signal detection interpretation of remember/know judgments.

Authors:  John T Wixted; Vincent Stretch
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-08

2.  Recognition memory and awareness: occurrence of perceptual effects in remembering or in knowing depends on conscious resources at encoding, but not at retrieval.

Authors:  John M Gardiner; Vernon H Gregg; Irene Karayianni
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.