Literature DB >> 11798425

Degree of male ornamentation affects female preference for conspecific versus heterospecific males.

Sarah A Collins1, S T Luddem.   

Abstract

Several studies have shown female preference for conspecific males with the attached artificial ornaments of more elaborate heterospecifics. However, preference for heterospecifics under natural conditions is relatively rare. We tested what factors affect behavioural mechanisms of species isolation using three species of estrildid finch (genus Uraeginthus) that occur in both sympatry and allopatry. These finches differ in degree of sexual dimorphism; male ornamentation; behavioural and morphological similarity; and phylogenetic distance. Paired mate-choice trials were used in which females were presented with a conspecific and heterospecific male to test which of the above between-species differences best predicted the degree of premating isolation. The three species differed in the degree of species-specific mate preference shown. Females from the brighter two species discriminated against dull males, independently of sympatry-allopatry, similarity and phylogenetic distance. Females from the dull species reacted to conspecific males and brighter heterospecific males equally strongly, independently of similarity and phylogenetic distance. In contrast to previous studies, an equal preference for heterospecific and conspecific males was found under natural conditions. It is suggested that differences between closely related species in male ornamentation affect the likelihood that premating isolation will occur due to the fact that sexual selection tends to drive preferences for exaggerated ornamentation.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11798425      PMCID: PMC1690881          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  11 in total

1.  Reinforcement and the genetics of nonrandom mating.

Authors:  M R Servedio
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Reinforcement and divergence under assortative mating.

Authors:  M Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Hybridization of bird species.

Authors:  P R Grant; B R Grant
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-04-10       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Female preference predates the evolution of the sword in swordtail fish.

Authors:  A L Basolo
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-11-09       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Speciation driven by natural selection in Drosophila.

Authors:  M A Noor
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-06-22       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Response to interspecific vocalizations is affected by degree of phylogenetic relatedness in Streptopelia doves.

Authors:  Selvino R. de Kort; Carel ten Cate
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Male advertisement call and female preference in sympatric and allopatric midwife toads

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus.

Authors:  M J Ryan; J H Fox; W Wilczynski; A S Rand
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-01-04       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Evolutionary change in a receiver bias: a comparison of female preference functions.

Authors:  A L Basolo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Asymmetries in mating preferences between species: female swordtails prefer heterospecific males.

Authors:  M J Ryan; W E Wagner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  4 in total

1.  Pedigrees, assortative mating and speciation in Darwin's finches.

Authors:  Peter R Grant; B Rosemary Grant
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Conflicting preferences within females: sexual selection versus species recognition.

Authors:  Gil G Rosenthal; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Uniformity in premating reproductive isolation along an intraspecific cline.

Authors:  Jeanne Marie Robertson; Roman Nava; Andrés Vega; Kristine Kaiser
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.624

4.  The causes and evolutionary consequences of mixed singing in two hybridizing songbird species (Luscinia spp.).

Authors:  Jana Vokurková; Tereza Petrusková; Radka Reifová; Alexandra Kozman; Libor Mořkovský; Silke Kipper; Michael Weiss; Jiří Reif; Paweł T Dolata; Adam Petrusek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.