Literature DB >> 2296291

Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus.

M J Ryan1, J H Fox, W Wilczynski, A S Rand.   

Abstract

The sensory bases of species and population mate preferences are well known; in frogs properties of the female auditory system influence such preferences. By contrast, there is little understanding of how sensory characteristics could result in sexual selection within a population. One possible mechanism is that females are more sensitive to male courtship signals that deviate from the population mean. We document this mechanism in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus. Female basilar papilla tuning is biased toward lower-than-average frequencies in the 'chuck' portion of the male's call, explaining female preference for the lower-frequency chucks produced by larger males. The tuning does not differ between P. pustulosus and its close relative P. coloradorum, a species in which males never evolved the ability to produce chucks; thus the female tuning evolved before the chuck and therefore the chuck played no role in the evolution of the preference. This allows us to reject two popular hypotheses for the evolution of this female preference (runaway sexual selection and natural selection) in favour of a third: sexual selection for sensory exploitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2296291     DOI: 10.1038/343066a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  62 in total

1.  Degree of male ornamentation affects female preference for conspecific versus heterospecific males.

Authors:  Sarah A Collins; S T Luddem
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Vestigial preference functions in neural networks and túngara frogs.

Authors:  S M Phelps; M J Ryan; A S Rand
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Signal efficacy and the evolution of male dimorphism in the jumping spider, Maevia inclemens.

Authors:  D L Clark; G W Uetz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Non-parallel coevolution of sender and receiver in the acoustic communication system of treefrogs.

Authors:  Johannes Schul; Sarah L Bush
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Co-option of male courtship signals from aggressive display in bowerbirds.

Authors:  G Borgia; S W Coleman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Avian psychology and communication.

Authors:  Candy Rowe; John Skelhorn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Looking for sexual selection in the female brain.

Authors:  Molly E Cummings
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 8.  The evolutionary outcome of sexual conflict.

Authors:  C M Lessells
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 9.  Sensory ecology and perceptual allocation: new prospects for neural networks.

Authors:  Steven M Phelps
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Directional female preference for an exaggerated male trait in canary (Serinus canaria) song.

Authors:  Tudor I Drăgănoiu; Laurent Nagle; Michel Kreutzer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.