Literature DB >> 11170713

Response to interspecific vocalizations is affected by degree of phylogenetic relatedness in Streptopelia doves.

Selvino R. de Kort1, Carel ten Cate.   

Abstract

Owing to common descent, related species often show similarity in a number of traits, including those involved in communication. As a result signal similarity and phylogenetic distance are usually inversly related. However, similarity in signal structure need not correspond with similarity in response to such signals. We tested the hypothesis that individuals are more responsive to signals from closely related species than from distantly related ones. We conducted playback experiments on two turtle dove species (African collared-dove, Streptopelia roseogrisea, and vinaceous dove, Streptopelia vinacea) using conspecific and heterospecific vocalizations. Vocalizations were played from species that differed in degree of relatedness and in relative geographical distribution. This enabled us to separate the effects of phylogeny and those of sympatry. There was an effect of phylogenetic distance, with a decrease in response to playback stimuli as phylogenetic distance increased. The results also suggest a minor effect of sympatry, with the response to sympatric species being lower. Copyright 2001 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 11170713     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  10 in total

1.  Degree of male ornamentation affects female preference for conspecific versus heterospecific males.

Authors:  Sarah A Collins; S T Luddem
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Body size evolution simultaneously creates and collapses species boundaries in a clade of scincid lizards.

Authors:  Jonathan Q Richmond; Elizabeth L Jockusch
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Male territorial vocalizations and responses are decoupled in an avian hybrid zone.

Authors:  Paula M den Hartog; Hans Slabbekoorn; Carel Ten Cate
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Tape lures swell bycatch on a Mediterranean island harbouring illegal bird trapping.

Authors:  Matteo Sebastianelli; Georgios Savva; Michaella Moysi; Alexander N G Kirschel
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Difference between the vocalizations of two sister species of pigeons explained in dynamical terms.

Authors:  R Gogui Alonso; Cecilia Kopuchian; Ana Amador; Maria de Los Angeles Suarez; Pablo L Tubaro; Gabriel B Mindlin
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Interspecific semantic alarm call recognition in the solitary Sahamalaza sportive lemur, Lepilemur sahamalazensis.

Authors:  Melanie Seiler; Christoph Schwitzer; Marco Gamba; Marc W Holderied
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Humans identify negative (but not positive) arousal in silver fox vocalizations: implications for the adaptive value of interspecific eavesdropping.

Authors:  Piera Filippi; Svetlana S Gogoleva; Elena V Volodina; Ilya A Volodin; Bart de Boer
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.624

8.  Reproductive interference in live-bearing fish: the male guppy is a potential biological agent for eradicating invasive mosquitofish.

Authors:  K Tsurui-Sato; S Fujimoto; O Deki; T Suzuki; H Tatsuta; K Tsuji
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Acoustic divergence in the communication of cryptic species of nocturnal primates (Microcebus ssp.).

Authors:  Pia Braune; Sabine Schmidt; Elke Zimmermann
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 7.431

10.  Interspecific comparison of traffic noise effects on dove coo transmission in urban environments.

Authors:  Bao-Sen Shieh; Shih-Hsiung Liang; Yuh-Wen Chiu; Szu-Ying Lin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.