Literature DB >> 14726987

Distractor modulation of saccade trajectories: spatial separation and symmetry effects.

Eugene McSorley1, Patrick Haggard, Robin Walker.   

Abstract

The trajectories of saccadic eye movements can be modulated by the presence of a competing visual distractor. In the present study the trajectories of vertical saccades curved away from a single visual distractor presented in one visual field, but tended to be straight when two distractors were presented at mirror symmetric locations in both visual fields. The spatial nature of the mirror distractor effect was examined by presenting a second distractor at mirror and non-mirror locations. Saccade trajectories also tended to be straight with both mirror and non-mirror symmetrical distractors. The relationship between the distractor location and saccade curvature was examined in a third experiment by manipulating the distractor-to-target spatial separation. Although there was a tendency for greater curvature when the distractor was presented in the same hemifield as the target there was no clear relationship between curvature and distractor location. The results show that the distractor modulation of saccade trajectory is not highly spatially specific and that it can be balanced by a second bilateral distractor in the opposite visual field. The results are interpreted in terms of a model in which the initial saccade direction and curvature back towards the saccade goal are controlled by separate processes. Initial saccade direction is modulated by the inhibition of distractor locations within a 'motor map' specifying saccade direction. Curvature back towards the saccade goal may be attributed to a feedback system, with a separate representation of the visual target location, that enables an on-line correction of the saccade during mid-flight.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14726987     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1729-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  36 in total

1.  Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control.

Authors:  J Theeuwes; A F Kramer; S Hahn; D E Irwin; G J Zelinsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Concurrent processing of saccades in visual search.

Authors:  R M McPeek; A A Skavenski; K Nakayama
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Interaction of the frontal eye field and superior colliculus for saccade generation.

Authors:  D P Hanes; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Evidence against a moving hill in the superior colliculus during saccadic eye movements in the monkey.

Authors:  Robijanto Soetedjo; Chris R S Kaneko; Albert F Fuchs
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Programming of endogenous and exogenous saccades: evidence for a competitive integration model.

Authors:  Richard Godijn; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Target similarity affects saccade curvature away from irrelevant onsets.

Authors:  Casimir J H Ludwig; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Inhibitory mechanisms of neural and cognitive control: applications to selective attention and sequential action.

Authors:  G Houghton; S P Tipper
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Effect of remote distractors on saccade programming: evidence for an extended fixation zone.

Authors:  R Walker; H Deubel; W X Schneider; J M Findlay
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  A field theory of saccade generation: temporal-to-spatial transform in the superior colliculus.

Authors:  L M Optican
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Contrast sensitivity at high velocities.

Authors:  D C Burr; J Ross
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  25 in total

1.  How automatic is the hand's automatic pilot? Evidence from dual-task studies.

Authors:  Robert D McIntosh; Amy Mulroue; James R Brockmole
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Looking away: distractor influences on saccadic trajectory and endpoint in prosaccade and antisaccade tasks.

Authors:  Kaitlin E W Laidlaw; Mona J H Zhu; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Our eyes deviate away from a location where a distractor is expected to appear.

Authors:  Stefan Van der Stigchel; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Preparation and execution of saccades: the problem of limited capacity of computational resources.

Authors:  Uwe J Ilg; Yu Jin; Stefan Schumann; Urs Schwarz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Incomplete suppression of distractor-related activity in the frontal eye field results in curved saccades.

Authors:  Robert M McPeek
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Target selection for visually guided reaching in macaque.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Naomi Takahashi; Robert M McPeek
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Distractor effects on saccade trajectories: a comparison of prosaccades, antisaccades, and memory-guided saccades.

Authors:  Wieske van Zoest; Stefan Van der Stigchel; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Time course of motor preparation during visual search with flexible stimulus-response association.

Authors:  Husam A Katnani; Neeraj J Gandhi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Saccadic eye movements as an index of perceptual decision-making.

Authors:  Eugene McSorley; Rachel McCloy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Oculomotor responses and visuospatial perceptual judgments compete for common limited resources.

Authors:  Marc S Tibber; Simon Grant; Michael J Morgan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.