Literature DB >> 11795754

The use of interbody cage devices for spinal deformity: a biomechanical perspective.

Bryan W Cunningham1, David W Polly.   

Abstract

Spinal instrumentation has revolutionized the treatment of spinal deformities and offers a plethora of techniques and designs to surgically treat deformity conditions. The authors address the biomechanical properties afforded by various posterior and anterior spinal instrumentation mechanisms, with and without intervertebral reconstruction, and the principles associated with optimal reconstruction techniques. The integration of multiple strategies can improve anterior and posterior construct stiffness in the treatment of spinal deformities. Structural interbody support probably is the best method to minimize longitudinal rod and screw-bone interface strain. Moreover, anterior load-bearing structural grafts and interbody devices have been shown to increase construct stiffness, decrease the incidence posterior implant failure, permit the use of smaller diameter longitudinal rods, and may enhance the rate of successful spinal arthrodesis. From a biomechanical standpoint, treatment of medium to high-grade spondylolisthesis with stand-alone interbody or transvertebral cages, in the absence of supplemental posterior fixation, is contraindicated. Collectively, the included studies reinforce the principles of load sharing between the anterior and posterior spinal columns and affirm the biomechanical dominance of anterior column support in circumferential spinal arthrodesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11795754     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200201000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  11 in total

Review 1.  [Interbody metal implants ("cages") for lumbar fusion].

Authors:  G Freiherr von Salis-Soglio; R Scholz; K Seller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Unilateral versus bilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar disorders: a prospective randomised study.

Authors:  Kai Zhang; Wei Sun; Chang-qing Zhao; Hua Li; Wei Ding; You-zhuan Xie; Xiao-jiang Sun; Jie Zhao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Lumbar interbody fusion: a parametric investigation of a novel cage design with and without posterior instrumentation.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Hendrik Schmidt; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  [Complications of the lumbosacral junction in adult deformity surgery : Indications and technique for posterior and anterior revision surgery].

Authors:  A Tateen; J Bogert; H Koller; A Hempfing
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  [Monosegmental anterior lumbar interbody fusion with the SynFix-LR™ device. A prospective 2-year follow-up study].

Authors:  E Hoff; P Strube; C Gross; T Hartwig; M Putzier
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Relation between radiological assessment and biomechanical stability of lumbar interbody fusion in a large animal model.

Authors:  R J Kroeze; A J van der Veen; B J van Royen; R A Bank; M N Helder; T H Smit
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Expandable Polyaryl-Ether-Ether-Ketone Spacers for Interbody Distraction in the Lumbar Spine.

Authors:  Marjan Alimi; Benjamin Shin; Michael Macielak; Christoph P Hofstetter; Innocent Njoku; Apostolos J Tsiouris; Eric Elowitz; Roger Härtl
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-06

8.  Analytical comparison study of the clinical and radiological outcome of spine fixation using posterolateral, posterior lumber interbody and transforaminal lumber interbody spinal fixation techniques to treat lumber spine degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  Moh'd M Al Barbarawi; Ziad M Audat; Mohammed Z Allouh
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2015-05-27

Review 9.  A comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qunhu Zhang; Zhen Yuan; Min Zhou; Huan Liu; Yong Xu; Yongxin Ren
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Does PEEK/HA Enhance Bone Formation Compared With PEEK in a Sheep Cervical Fusion Model?

Authors:  William R Walsh; Matthew H Pelletier; Nicky Bertollo; Chris Christou; Chris Tan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.