Literature DB >> 11790827

Sequential control signals determine arm and trunk contributions to hand transport during reaching in humans.

Elena Rossi1, Arnold Mitnitski, Anatol G Feldman.   

Abstract

When reaching towards objects placed outside the arm workspace, the trunk assumes an active role in transport of the hand by contributing to the extent of movement while simultaneously maintaining the direction of reach. We investigated the spatial-temporal aspects of the integration of the trunk motion into reaching. Specifically, we tested the hypothesis that the efficiency ('gain') of the arm-trunk co-ordination determining the contribution of the trunk to the extent of hand movement may vary substantially with the phase of reaching. Sitting subjects made fast pointing movements towards ipsi- and a contralateral targets placed beyond the reach of the right arm so that a forward trunk motion was required to assist in transporting the hand to the target. Sight of the arm and target was blocked before the movement onset. In randomly selected trials, the trunk motion was unexpectedly prevented by an electromagnet. Subjects were instructed to make stereotypical movements whether or not the trunk was arrested. In non-perturbed trials, most subjects began to move the hand and trunk simultaneously. In trunk-blocked trials, it was impossible for the hand to cover the whole pointing distance but the hand trajectory and velocity profile initially matched those from the trials in which the trunk motion was free, approximately until the hand reached its peak velocity. The arm inter-joint co-ordination substantially changed in response to the trunk arrest at a minimal latency of 40 ms after the perturbation onset. The results suggest that when the trunk was free, the influence of the trunk motion on the hand trajectory and velocity profile was initially neutralized by appropriate changes in the arm joint angles. Only after the hand had reached its peak velocity did the trunk contribute to the extent of pointing. Previous studies suggested that the central commands underlying the transport component of arm movements are completed when the hand reaches peak velocity. These studies, together with the present finding that the trunk only begins to contribute to the hand displacement at peak hand velocity, imply that the central commands that determine the contributions of the arm and the trunk to the transport of the hand are generated sequentially, even though the arm and trunk move in parallel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11790827      PMCID: PMC2290074          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.012809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  40 in total

1.  The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task.

Authors:  J P Scholz; G Schöner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Computational nature of human adaptive control during learning of reaching movements in force fields.

Authors:  N Bhushan; R Shadmehr
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Multi-muscle control of head movements in monkeys: the referent configuration hypothesis.

Authors:  F G Lestienne; F Thullier; P Archambault; M F Levin; A G Feldman
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2000-03-31       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Control of Trajectory Modifications in Target-Directed Reaching.

Authors:  J. R. Flanagan; D. J. Ostry; A. G. Feldman
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Control processes underlying elbow flexion movements may be independent of kinematic and electromyographic patterns: experimental study and modelling.

Authors:  N St-Onge; S V Adamovich; A G Feldman
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  The coordination between trunk and arm motion during pointing movements.

Authors:  T R Kaminski; C Bock; A M Gentile
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The influence of different descending systems on the tonic stretch reflex in the cat.

Authors:  A G Feldman; G N Orlovsky
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 5.330

8.  Control variables and proprioceptive feedback in fast single-joint movement.

Authors:  M F Levin; Y Lamarre; A G Feldman
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.273

Review 9.  Coordination and coarticulation in speech production.

Authors:  C A Fowler; E Saltzman
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1993 Apr-Sep       Impact factor: 1.500

10.  Functionally specific articulatory cooperation following jaw perturbations during speech: evidence for coordinative structures.

Authors:  J A Kelso; B Tuller; E Vatikiotis-Bateson; C A Fowler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  15 in total

1.  Hemispheric specialization in the co-ordination of arm and trunk movements during pointing in patients with unilateral brain damage.

Authors:  Danilo Y Esparza; Philippe S Archambault; Carolee J Winstein; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-12-21       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Arm-trunk coordination in the absence of proprioception.

Authors:  E Tunik; H Poizner; M F Levin; S V Adamovich; J Messier; Y Lamarre; A G Feldman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Vestibular contribution to combined arm and trunk motion.

Authors:  Franck Mars; Philippe S Archambault; Anatol G Feldman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Workspace location influences joint coordination during reaching in post-stroke hemiparesis.

Authors:  Darcy S Reisman; John P Scholz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-19       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Age-related changes in upper limb coordination in a complex reaching task.

Authors:  Sajida Khanafer; Heidi Sveistrup; Mindy F Levin; Erin K Cressman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Palmar arch dynamics during reach-to-grasp tasks.

Authors:  Archana P Sangole; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Reach-to-grasp movement as a minimization process.

Authors:  Fang Yang; Anatol G Feldman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Motor compensation and its effects on neural reorganization after stroke.

Authors:  Theresa A Jones
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Referent control and motor equivalence of reaching from standing.

Authors:  Yosuke Tomita; Anatol G Feldman; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Palmar arch modulation in patients with hemiparesis after a stroke.

Authors:  Archana P Sangole; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.