Literature DB >> 14504854

Arm-trunk coordination in the absence of proprioception.

E Tunik1, H Poizner, M F Levin, S V Adamovich, J Messier, Y Lamarre, A G Feldman.   

Abstract

During trunk-assisted reaching to targets placed within arm's length, the influence of trunk motion on the hand trajectory is compensated for by changes in the arm configuration. The role of proprioception in this compensation was investigated by analyzing the movements of 2 deafferented and 12 healthy subjects. Subjects reached to remembered targets (placed approximately 80 degrees ipsilateral or approximately 45 degrees contralateral to the sagittal midline) with an active forward movement of the trunk produced by hip flexion. In 40% of randomly selected trials, trunk motion was mechanically blocked. No visual feedback was provided during the experiment. The hand trajectory and velocity profiles of healthy subjects remained invariant whether or not the trunk was blocked. The invariance was achieved by changes in arm interjoint coordination that, for reaches toward the ipsilateral target, started as early as 50 ms after the perturbation. Both deafferented subjects exhibited considerable, though incomplete, compensation for the effects of the perturbation. Compensation was more successful for reaches to the ipsilateral target. Both deafferented subjects showed invariance between conditions (unobstructed or blocked trunk motion) in their hand paths to the ipsilateral target, and one did to the contralateral target. For the other deafferented subject, hand paths in the two types of trials began to deviate after about 50% into the movement, because of excessive elbow extension. In movements to the ipsilateral target, when deafferented subjects compensated successfully, the changes in arm joint angles were initiated as early as 50 ms after the trunk perturbation, similar to healthy subjects. Although the deafferented subjects showed less than ideal compensatory control, they compensated to a remarkably large extent given their complete loss of proprioception. The presence of partial compensation in the absence of vision and proprioception points to the likelihood that not only proprioception but also vestibulospinal pathways help mediate this compensation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14504854     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1576-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  43 in total

1.  Vestibulospinal reflexes: quantitative effects of sensory feedback and postural task.

Authors:  M S Welgampola; J G Colebatch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of transmastoid electrical stimulation on the triceps brachii EMG in man.

Authors:  F Baldissera; P Cavallari; G Tassone
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Independent coactivation of shoulder and elbow muscles.

Authors:  P L Gribble; D J Ostry
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Control variables and proprioceptive feedback in fast single-joint movement.

Authors:  M F Levin; Y Lamarre; A G Feldman
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.273

5.  Control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without proprioception.

Authors:  R L Sainburg; M F Ghilardi; H Poizner; C Ghez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Rapid elbow flexion in the absence of proprioceptive and cutaneous feedback.

Authors:  R Forget; Y Lamarre
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1987

7.  Somatosensory loss increases vestibulospinal sensitivity.

Authors:  F B Horak; F Hlavacka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Impairments of reaching movements in patients without proprioception. I. Spatial errors.

Authors:  J Gordon; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Control of eye-head coordination during orienting gaze shifts.

Authors:  D Guitton
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 13.837

10.  Functional MRI of galvanic vestibular stimulation.

Authors:  E Lobel; J F Kleine; D L Bihan; A Leroy-Willig; A Berthoz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  14 in total

1.  Control of wrist position and muscle relaxation by shifting spatial frames of reference for motoneuronal recruitment: possible involvement of corticospinal pathways.

Authors:  Helli Raptis; Liziane Burtet; Robert Forget; Anatol G Feldman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  The kinematics of upper extremity reaching: a reliability study on people with and without shoulder impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Jean-Sébastien Roy; Hélène Moffet; Bradford J McFadyen; Joy C Macdermid
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol       Date:  2010-03-23

3.  On the nature of the vestibular control of arm-reaching movements during whole-body rotations.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Bresciani; Gabriel M Gauthier; Jean-Louis Vercher; Jean Blouin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-14       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The role of different submovement types during pointing to a target.

Authors:  Deric Wisleder; Natalia Dounskaia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Postural sway at ground and bevel levels in subjects with spina bifida occulta.

Authors:  Shin-Tsu Chang; Chih-Hung Ku
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Coordination between postural and movement controls: effect of changes in body mass distribution on postural and focal component characteristics.

Authors:  Gilles Robert; Jean Blouin; Hélène Ruget; Laurence Mouchnino
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Age-related changes in upper limb coordination in a complex reaching task.

Authors:  Sajida Khanafer; Heidi Sveistrup; Mindy F Levin; Erin K Cressman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Movement planning with probabilistic target information.

Authors:  Todd E Hudson; Laurence T Maloney; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Repetitive arm motion-induced fatigue affects shoulder but not endpoint position sense.

Authors:  Kim Emery; Julie N Côté
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Deficits in adaptive upper limb control in response to trunk perturbations in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  E Tunik; H Poizner; S V Adamovich; M F Levin; A G Feldman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.