Literature DB >> 11790406

Differential effect of free intake versus oral perfusion of sucrose in conditioned taste aversion in rats.

N Fouquet1, P Oberling, G Sandner.   

Abstract

Five experiments were designed to investigate LiCl-induced conditioned taste aversion (CTA) obtained in rats whether after free intake of a sucrose solution (active mode) or after forced administration through an intraoral cannula (passive mode). It was found in Experiment 1 that actively conditioned rats showed a slower extinction rate as revealed by repeated two-bottle tests (active testing) as opposed to passively conditioned ones. As these rats underwent a mode change between conditioning and testing, the differential extinction rate might have arisen from this change inducing a generalization decrement effect or acting as a contextual shift. In Experiment 2, no evidence for any generalization decrement was found. The possibility that the mode of sucrose delivery could have contextual properties in CTA through a "renewal test" after extinction and a latent inhibition experiment was further tested in Experiments 3 and 4. When active testing followed passive extinction, a CTA was afresh obtained in rats actively conditioned in active conditions. Latent inhibition was attenuated in rats preexposed in passive conditions and conditioned in active conditions (i.e., when a shift in the drinking mode occurred between preexposure and conditioning). In Experiment 5, intraoral perfusion was used in both groups. The active subjects had to nose poke for intraoral administration of sucrose. The yoked control passive subjects received simultaneously the same amount of sucrose. The levels of CTA differed also from the actively to the passively conditioned subjects. Results are discussed in terms of free intake activity acting as a contextual modulator of CTA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11790406     DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(01)00585-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  8 in total

1.  Latent inhibition of conditioned disgust reactions in rats.

Authors:  Matías López; Patricia Gasalla; Mercedes Vega; Cheryl L Limebeer; Erin M Rock; Katharine J Tuerke; Holly Bedard; Linda A Parker
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Extinction of a saccharin-lithium association: assessment by consumption and taste reactivity.

Authors:  Raúl Cantora; Matías López; Luis Aguado; Shadna Rana; Linda A Parker
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Nonreinforced flavor exposure attenuates the effects of conditioned taste aversion on both flavor consumption and cue palatability.

Authors:  Dominic Michael Dwyer; Patricia Gasalla; Matías López
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Chemosensory responsiveness to ethanol and its individual sensory components in alcohol-preferring, alcohol-nonpreferring and genetically heterogeneous rats.

Authors:  Susan M Brasser; Bryant C Silbaugh; Myles J Ketchum; Jeffrey J Olney; Christian H Lemon
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 4.280

5.  Failure to Find Ethanol-Induced Conditioned Taste Aversion in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  Christopher A Varnon; Christopher W Dinges; Timothy E Black; Harrington Wells; Charles I Abramson
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  Detrimental effects of self-administered methamphetamine during pregnancy on offspring development in the rat.

Authors:  Daniela Rüedi-Bettschen; Donna M Platt
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  A comparison between taste avoidance and conditioned disgust reactions induced by ethanol and lithium chloride in preweanling rats.

Authors:  Carlos Arias; Ricardo Marcos Pautassi; Juan Carlos Molina; Norman E Spear
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.038

8.  One-Year Follow-Up of Healthy Older Adults with Electroencephalographic Risk for Neurocognitive Disorder After Neurofeedback Training.

Authors:  Graciela C Alatorre-Cruz; Thalía Fernández; Susana A Castro-Chavira; Mauricio González-López; Sergio M Sánchez-Moguel; Juan Silva-Pereyra
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 4.472

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.