Literature DB >> 11788083

Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. XIV. Nondirectiveness and counseling skills.

S Kessler1.   

Abstract

The difficulties some professionals have in achieving nondirective goals is largely due to the inadequate and ineffective application of basic counseling skills. The "new genetics," with its emphasis on decision-making in association with genetic testing, is among the most demanding forms of personal counseling, the effectiveness of which depends largely on the professional's human experience and counseling abilities. Examples are given showing inadequacies in professional responses to clients in genetic counseling which, in turn, defeat the achievement of a nondirectiveness that is helpful to clients, supports their self-directedness, and leaves them more psychologically prepared for quality decision making. Other models of counseling (e.g., shared decision making) will not fare any better than the nondirective one unless counseling skills of professionals in genetic services are upgraded in a significant way. Professional organizations need to give greater attention to the training and postgraduate supervision of all personnel involved in genetics services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11788083     DOI: 10.1089/10906570152742227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Test        ISSN: 1090-6576


  8 in total

1.  Effects of a genetic counseling model on mothers of children with down syndrome: a Brazilian pilot study.

Authors:  Marcos Ricardo Datti Micheletto; Nelson Iguimar Valerio; Agnes Cristina Fett-Conte
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-06-23       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Balancing Genetics (Science) and Counseling (Art) in Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Testing.

Authors:  Allison Werner-Lin; Judith L M McCoyd; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Genetic counseling for prenatal testing: where is the discussion about disability?

Authors:  Ellyn Farrelly; Mildred K Cho; Lori Erby; Debra Roter; Anabel Stenzel; Kelly Ormond
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Quality in genetic counselling for presymptomatic testing--clinical guidelines for practice across the range of genetic conditions.

Authors:  Heather Skirton; Lesley Goldsmith; Leigh Jackson; Aad Tibben
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  A tailored approach to family-centered genetic counseling for cystic fibrosis newborn screening: the Wisconsin model.

Authors:  Audrey Tluczek; Christina Zaleski; Dania Stachiw-Hietpas; Peggy Modaff; Craig R Adamski; Megan R Nelson; Catherine A Reiser; Sumedha Ghate; Kevin D Josephson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-10-09       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Decreasing uptake of predictive testing for Huntington's disease in a German centre: 12 years' experience (1993-2004).

Authors:  Christiane Bernhardt; Anne-Marie Schwan; Peter Kraus; Joerg Thomas Epplen; Erdmute Kunstmann
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 7.  Shared decision making in mental health: prospects for personalized medicine.

Authors:  Robert E Drake; Delia Cimpean; William C Torrey
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.986

Review 8.  The Psychological Challenges of Replacing Conventional Karyotyping with Genomic SNP Array Analysis in Prenatal Testing.

Authors:  Sam Riedijk; Karin E M Diderich; Sanne L van der Steen; Lutgarde C P Govaerts; Marieke Joosten; Maarten F C M Knapen; Femke A T de Vries; Diane van Opstal; Aad Tibben; Robert-Jan H Galjaard
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 4.241

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.