Literature DB >> 11787907

The safety and effectiveness of a new hysteroscopic method for permanent birth control: results of the first Essure pbc clinical study.

J F Kerin1, C S Carignan, D Cher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current methods of female surgical sterilisation require incisional surgery, general anaesthesia and a prolonged recovery time. We studied the safety and effectiveness of Essure pbc, a minimally invasive, transcervically placed micro-insert that occludes the Fallopian tubes, resulting in permanent female contraception. Device under study: The Essure pbc implant is a dynamically expanding micro-insert which is placed in the proximal section of the Fallopian tube using a modified minimal access technology for cannulating the tube. STUDY POPULATION: Women aged 21-43 seeking permanent birth control.
METHODOLOGY: Essure pbc micro-inserts were inserted into the proximal portion of the Fallopian tubes under hysteroscopic visualisation with intravenous sedation or paracervical block.
RESULTS: Bilateral device placement was achieved in 111 of 130 (85%) women who underwent device placement attempts. Women found the device placement procedure to be highly acceptable. Of women wearing the device for up to two years rate, 97% rated it to be very good to excellent. There have been no pregnancies reported in 1894 woman-months of effectiveness. Adverse events preventing women from relying on Essure pbc were < 5%. DISCUSSION: This first clinical trial showed the Essure pbc method of permanent contraception to be safe and highly acceptable to women. Experience and improvements to the delivery system should increase overall micro-insert placement rates.
CONCLUSION: The Essure pbc method of permanent contraception is an exciting alternative to vasectomy or laparoscopic sterilisation that does not require general anaesthesia or incisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11787907     DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.2001.tb01311.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  11 in total

1.  Hysteroscopic placement of tubal sterilization implants: virtual reality simulator training.

Authors:  Pierre Panel; Michael Bajka; Arnaud Le Tohic; Alaa El Ghoneimi; Carmen Chis; Stéphane Cotin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Transcervical sterilization: a comparison of essure(r) permanent birth control system and adiana(r) permanent contraception system.

Authors:  Sophia N Palmer; James A Greenberg
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

3.  [Bladder tumor with dislocated intrauterine pessary - Result of implant allergy?]

Authors:  Diana Lill; Burkhard Summer; Michael J Flaig; Peter Thomas
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 4.  Fallopian tube catheterization.

Authors:  Amy Suzanne Thurmond
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  Tubal risk markers for failure to place transcervical sterilization coils.

Authors:  Ophra Leyser-Whalen; Mahta Rouhani; Mahbubur Rahman; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Hysterosalpingogram: an essential examination following Essure hysteroscopic sterilisation.

Authors:  V Shah; N Panay; R Williamson; A Hemingway
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  What are the factors predictive of hysterosalpingogram compliance after female sterilization by the Essure procedure in a publicly insured population?

Authors:  David L Howard; Jeffrey Wall; Julie L Strickland
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-12

Review 8.  A Meta-Analysis of Bilateral Essure® Procedural Placement Success Rates on First Attempt.

Authors:  Gabriel Frietze; Ophra Leyser-Whalen; Mahbubur Rahman; Mahta Rouhani; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  J Gynecol Surg       Date:  2015-12-01

Review 9.  Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors:  K McMartin
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2013-10-01

10.  Comparing options for females seeking permanent contraception in high resource countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca Gormley; Brian Vickers; Brooke Cheng; Wendy V Norman
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 3.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.