Literature DB >> 23212398

What are the factors predictive of hysterosalpingogram compliance after female sterilization by the Essure procedure in a publicly insured population?

David L Howard1, Jeffrey Wall, Julie L Strickland.   

Abstract

To determine what factors are predictive of post-Essure hysterosalpingogram (HSG) compliance. We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent the Essure procedure at the two campuses of the Truman Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, from January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2010. Our study population consisted primarily of women who were publicly insured (89.0 %) and unmarried (76.7 %). Of 132 patients referred for HSG, 70 (53.0 %) complied. In adjusted analyses women 35 years and older had an almost fourfold higher odds of HSG compliance (OR = 3.72, 95 % CI 1.35-10.23) and women with 3 or more living children had a 64 % lower odds of HSG compliance (OR = 0.36, 95 % CI 0.16-0.82). Women younger than 35 who had 3 or more children had the lowest compliance rate (36.4 %) suggesting an interaction between age and parity. Women undergoing the Essure procedure at the campus with a dedicated protocol to ensure compliance had an almost fourfold higher odds of HSG compliance (OR = 3.67, 95 % CI 1.01-13.40). In a population consisting largely of publicly insured, unmarried women, several factors are predictive of post-Essure HSG compliance. These include age, parity and the presence or absence of an institutional protocol to keep track of patients after their Essure procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23212398     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-012-1195-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  18 in total

1.  Office hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization: a critical cost analysis.

Authors:  Mark D Levie; Scott G Chudnoff
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.137

2.  Retrospective cost analysis comparing Essure hysteroscopic sterilization and laparoscopic bilateral tubal coagulation.

Authors:  Matthew R Hopkins; Douglas J Creedon; Amy E Wagie; Arthur R Williams; Abimbola O Famuyide
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.137

3.  Hysterosalpingogram: an essential examination following Essure hysteroscopic sterilisation.

Authors:  V Shah; N Panay; R Williamson; A Hemingway
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Ultrasound: an effective method for localization of the echogenic Essure sterilization micro-insert: correlation with radiologic evaluations.

Authors:  John F Kerin; Barbara S Levy
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.137

Review 5.  Women, men, and contraceptive sterilization.

Authors:  L L Bumpass; E Thomson; A L Godecker
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Trends in sterilization since the introduction of Essure hysteroscopic sterilization.

Authors:  Valerie I Shavell; Mazen E Abdallah; George H Shade; Michael P Diamond; Jay M Berman
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 4.137

7.  Satisfaction and tolerance with office hysteroscopic tubal sterilization.

Authors:  José E Arjona; Mónica Miño; Javier Cordón; Balbino Povedano; Blas Pelegrin; Camil Castelo-Branco
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Hysteroscopic sterilization in a large group practice: experience and effectiveness.

Authors:  Ulrike K Savage; Steven J Masters; Marcela C Smid; Yun-Yi Hung; Gavin F Jacobson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 9.  Contemporary hysteroscopic methods for female sterilization.

Authors:  Roger D Smith
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.561

10.  Does vasectomy explain the difference in tubal sterilization rates between black and white women?

Authors:  Sonya Borrero; Eleanor B Schwarz; Matthew F Reeves; James E Bost; Mitchell D Creinin; Said A Ibrahim
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  4 in total

1.  Adherence to hysterosalpingogram appointments following hysteroscopic sterilization among low-income women.

Authors:  Ophra Leyser-Whalen; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Improving Rates of Post-Essure Hysterosalpingography in an Urban Population Using Electronic Tracking Reminders.

Authors:  Yu-Han Virginia Hu; Kavita Shah Arora
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 4.137

Review 3.  A Meta-Analysis of Bilateral Essure® Procedural Placement Success Rates on First Attempt.

Authors:  Gabriel Frietze; Ophra Leyser-Whalen; Mahbubur Rahman; Mahta Rouhani; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  J Gynecol Surg       Date:  2015-12-01

4.  Analysis of surgeries performed after hysteroscopic sterilization as tabulated from 3,803 Essure patient experiences.

Authors:  E Scott Sills; Xiang Li; Samuel H Wood; Christopher A Jones
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2017-05-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.