BACKGROUND: Elevated waist circumference and body mass index (BMI), both traditional measures of obesity, are accepted risk factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Girls who are obese experience earlier onset of puberty and possibly greater breast development. We sought to evaluate whether a woman's breast size in late adolescence is associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in adulthood. METHODS: In conjunction with the ongoing Nurses' Health Study II [corrected], we conducted a prospective cohort study involving 92,106 of the participants. We assessed the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in relation to self-reported bra cup sizes, categorized as < or = A, B, C and > or = D cups, among participants at age 20. RESULTS: The mean age of participants at baseline was 38.1 years. A total of 1844 new cases of type 2 diabetes mellitus arose at a mean age of 44.9 years during 886,443 person-years of follow-up. Relative to bra cup size < or = A, the respective age-adjusted hazard ratios (and 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) were 2.30 (1.99-2.66) for B cup, 4.32 (3.71-5.04) for C cup and 4.99 (4.12-6.05) for > or = D cup. Upon further adjustments for age at menarche, parity, physical activity, smoking status, diet, multivitamin use, family history of diabetes mellitus, BMI at age 18 and current BMI, the corresponding hazard ratios (and 95% CIs) were 1.37 (1.18-1.59) for B cup, 1.80 (1.53- 2.11) for C cup and 1.64 (1.34-2.01) for > or = D cup. The addition of waist circumference to this model minimally changed the hazard ratios (and 95% CIs): 1.32 (1.14-1.53) for B cup, 1.71 (1.46-2.01) for C cup and 1.58 (1.29-1.94) for > or = D cup. INTERPRETATION: A large bra cup size at age 20 may be a predictor of type 2 diabetes mellitus in middle-aged women. Whether this relation is independent of traditional indicators of obesity remains to be determined.
BACKGROUND: Elevated waist circumference and body mass index (BMI), both traditional measures of obesity, are accepted risk factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Girls who are obese experience earlier onset of puberty and possibly greater breast development. We sought to evaluate whether a woman's breast size in late adolescence is associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in adulthood. METHODS: In conjunction with the ongoing Nurses' Health Study II [corrected], we conducted a prospective cohort study involving 92,106 of the participants. We assessed the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in relation to self-reported bra cup sizes, categorized as < or = A, B, C and > or = D cups, among participants at age 20. RESULTS: The mean age of participants at baseline was 38.1 years. A total of 1844 new cases of type 2 diabetes mellitus arose at a mean age of 44.9 years during 886,443 person-years of follow-up. Relative to bra cup size < or = A, the respective age-adjusted hazard ratios (and 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) were 2.30 (1.99-2.66) for B cup, 4.32 (3.71-5.04) for C cup and 4.99 (4.12-6.05) for > or = D cup. Upon further adjustments for age at menarche, parity, physical activity, smoking status, diet, multivitamin use, family history of diabetes mellitus, BMI at age 18 and current BMI, the corresponding hazard ratios (and 95% CIs) were 1.37 (1.18-1.59) for B cup, 1.80 (1.53- 2.11) for C cup and 1.64 (1.34-2.01) for > or = D cup. The addition of waist circumference to this model minimally changed the hazard ratios (and 95% CIs): 1.32 (1.14-1.53) for B cup, 1.71 (1.46-2.01) for C cup and 1.58 (1.29-1.94) for > or = D cup. INTERPRETATION: A large bra cup size at age 20 may be a predictor of type 2 diabetes mellitus in middle-aged women. Whether this relation is independent of traditional indicators of obesity remains to be determined.
Authors: Raymond C Boston; Mitchell D Schnall; Sarah A Englander; J Richard Landis; Peter J Moate Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: J F Gautier; A Mourier; E de Kerviler; A Tarentola; A X Bigard; J M Villette; C Y Guezennec; G Cathelineau Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 1998-04 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Heather J Baer; Graham A Colditz; Bernard Rosner; Karin B Michels; Janet W Rich-Edwards; David J Hunter; Walter C Willett Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2005-02-18 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Marie E Thoma; Mary L Hediger; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Joseph B Stanford; C Matthew Peterson; Mary S Croughan; Zhen Chen; Germaine M Buck Louis Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2012-08-08 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Jingmei Li; Jia Nee Foo; Nils Schoof; Jajini S Varghese; Pablo Fernandez-Navarro; Gretchen L Gierach; Swee Tian Quek; Mikael Hartman; Silje Nord; Vessela N Kristensen; Marina Pollán; Jonine D Figueroa; Deborah J Thompson; Yi Li; Chiea Chuen Khor; Keith Humphreys; Jianjun Liu; Kamila Czene; Per Hall Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2013-07-03 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: Daniel María Lubián López; Carmen Aisha Butrón Hinojo; María Castillo Lara; Manuel Sánchez-Prieto; Rafael Sánchez-Borrego; Nicolas Mendoza Ladrón de Guevara; Ernesto González Mesa Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-01-21 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Andrea Markkula; Maria Simonsson; Ann H Rosendahl; Alexander Gaber; Christian Ingvar; Carsten Rose; Helena Jernström Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2014-03-20 Impact factor: 7.396