Literature DB >> 11782835

Comparative responsiveness of locomotor tests and questionnaires used to follow early recovery after total knee arthroplasty.

Eric Parent1, Hélène Moffet.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the responsiveness of 3 locomotor tests and 2 questionnaires in the early stage after a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and to determine if the 4 responsiveness statistics ranked the measures similarly.
DESIGN: Longitudinal study.
SETTING: Rehabilitation institute. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-five men and 40 women with knee osteoarthritis scheduled for a first TKA.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Six-minute gait distance, in-laboratory gait speed and stair ascent duration, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index difficulty subscale, and Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey role-physical and physical functioning subscale scores. Effect size, standardized response mean, paired t test, and relative efficiency statistics were computed for 3 time intervals: (1) before TKA to 2 months after TKA, (2) 2 to 4 months after TKA, and (3) before TKA to 4 months after TKA.
RESULTS: Responsiveness varied according to tests and intervals considered. For all intervals, the WOMAC difficulty subscale was the most responsive questionnaire and the 6-minute gait test was the most responsive locomotor test. Stair ascent duration was the least responsive measure. Of the responsiveness indices used, only effect size ranked the tests differently.
CONCLUSIONS: The 6-minute gait test and the WOMAC difficulty subscale are recommended for outcome assessment during the early recovery period after TKA. Because interpretation guidelines are available and confidence intervals can be calculated for it, the standardized response mean is the most useful statistic. Copyright 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11782835     DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2002.27337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  62 in total

1.  The assessment of function: How is it measured? A clinical perspective.

Authors:  Michael P Reiman; Robert C Manske
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2011-05

2.  Reliability of the 6-min walk test after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas Linding Jakobsen; Henrik Kehlet; Thomas Bandholm
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Unilateral vs bilateral symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: associations between pain intensity and function.

Authors:  Daniel L Riddle; Paul W Stratford
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 7.580

4.  Weight-bearing asymmetry in relation to measures of impairment and functional mobility for people with knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Cory L Christiansen; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Hip abductor strength reliability and association with physical function after unilateral total knee arthroplasty: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ali H Alnahdi; Joseph A Zeni; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2014-03-20

6.  Strength and functional deficits in individuals with hip osteoarthritis compared to healthy, older adults.

Authors:  Dana L Judd; Abbey C Thomas; Michael R Dayton; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.033

7.  Measuring movement symmetry using tibial-mounted accelerometers for people recovering from total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Cory L Christiansen; Michael J Bade; Roger J Paxton; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 2.063

8.  Relationship between self-reported and performance-based tests in a hip and knee joint replacement population.

Authors:  Rajiv Gandhi; Dmitry Tsvetkov; J Roderick Davey; Khalid A Syed; Nizar N Mahomed
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  The visual analogue WOMAC 3.0 scale--internal validity and responsiveness of the VAS version.

Authors:  Paula Kersten; Peter J White; Alan Tennant
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Performance-Based Versus Self-Reported Outcomes Using the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael R Dayton; Dana L Judd; Craig A Hogan; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.159

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.